Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Arn said:I love that the referee about 3 feet away from the hit and looking directly at it calls nothing and the guy half way down the ice calls a penalty
Who cares, we need a D man that can punish and looks like the Borg is a crusherKaberle15 said:Arn said:I love that the referee about 3 feet away from the hit and looking directly at it calls nothing and the guy half way down the ice calls a penalty
To be fair, the puck was almost behind the net when he hits...
Kaberle15 said:Arn said:I love that the referee about 3 feet away from the hit and looking directly at it calls nothing and the guy half way down the ice calls a penalty
To be fair, the puck was almost behind the net when he hits...
Bender said:He already committed to the hit when he was making the pass, the pass took a half second to travel back round the net. I wouldn't call that a late hit and if it's not a late hit then it's not a penalty.
Nik the Trik said:Bender said:He already committed to the hit when he was making the pass, the pass took a half second to travel back round the net. I wouldn't call that a late hit and if it's not a late hit then it's not a penalty.
DeBrincat never made a pass. There's some debate as to whether or not the puck touched his stick but he never was in possession.
Which I think was ultimately the issue. He was committed to the hit before he knew if DeBrincat ever touched the puck and did so with no way of knowing if he did.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:Is there a grey area though?
DeBrincat was in a position to play the puck, motioned like he was going to and then made the decision not to, surely the dman must get some leeway in that situation?
WhatIfGodWasALeaf said:It's also frustrating that the ref that was 3 feet away looking directly at it thought it was fine and yet the far ref calls a penalty from 50 feet away.
Nik the Trik said:Which I think was ultimately the issue. He was committed to the hit before he knew if DeBrincat ever touched the puck and did so with no way of knowing if he did.
CarltonTheBear said:Nik the Trik said:Which I think was ultimately the issue. He was committed to the hit before he knew if DeBrincat ever touched the puck and did so with no way of knowing if he did.
DeBrincat kind of ran into him from behind moments earlier too. If it wasn't for the size/strength difference it could have been a dangerous hit. Not saying that that gives Borgman the right to go after him, but I'm sure he was a little irked about it and wanted to return the favour the first chance he got. And I'm sure the ref noticed that too and figured he was going hunting for a hit.