bustaheims
Active member
Peter D. said:Pretty much. Everyone kept referring to both arenas being a stone's throw away. Literally, not figuratively.
I think a main sticking point was the Leafs wanted to be the primary tenant. The Raptors had actually broken ground first, which made the Leafs stance all that more silly to have two arenas side-by-side. Then the ownership change occurred and the rest is history. The Leafs got in just in time to change the configurations of the arena, which if recall correctly included more private boxes as well as seat colours (the Raptors plans had platinum coloured seats throughout the arena). I actually still have the Leafs' design for their initial arena plans that I clipped out from the paper.
Interesting. Had things actually played out this way, Toronto could have had its own Madison Square Gardens type situation (obviously, not a direct parallel, as the Knicks & Rags play in the same arena - more about having a facility that can host more than one major event at a time) - though, I think, from a practical perspective, it would probably have been better for them to flip the locations, and not have the ice rink above a busy, heat producing transit hub.