Zee
Active member
herman said:https://twitter.com/mapleleafs/status/1149777983533699079
Get allllll the 7ths
Just looked at his draft year and Leafs could have taken Kevin Labanc in the next round. Mr $1M for 1 year deal with 56 points.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
herman said:https://twitter.com/mapleleafs/status/1149777983533699079
Get allllll the 7ths
cabber24 said:The Babcock ship has sailed for me, still can't believe he'll be back. I know we poke fun but it's not funny, his decision making has been ridiculous and if his curious decision making continues it will be a colossal piss off.
herman said:https://twitter.com/mapleleafs/status/1149777983533699079
Get allllll the 7ths
herman said:I?m still surprised we got something for an expiring right for a player that didn?t want to be here anymore. I guess St. Louis didn?t want to wait until August.
Nik the Trik said:herman said:I?m still surprised we got something for an expiring right for a player that didn?t want to be here anymore. I guess St. Louis didn?t want to wait until August.
"Future Considerations" is pushing the definition of "getting something" to its breaking point.
Nik the Trik said:herman said:I?m still surprised we got something for an expiring right for a player that didn?t want to be here anymore. I guess St. Louis didn?t want to wait until August.
"Future Considerations" is pushing the definition of "getting something" to its breaking point.
Andy said:Why? Ultimately you're getting something. If it was, say, getting something "good", then sure, mock all you want.
Nik the Trik said:Andy said:Why? Ultimately you're getting something. If it was, say, getting something "good", then sure, mock all you want.
I was being sort of semi-serious there but if you'd like to get into it then the way I understand what "future considerations" means is that it can basically be anything which may or may not mean that the Leafs get anything tangible. Like, for instance, it could be something as ridiculous as "If Joshua leads the NHL in scoring the next 4 years straight then the Leafs can swap 7th round picks with the Blues in the 2025 draft".
herman said:It?s an IOU from Doug Armstrong. It?s not literally something yet, but still north of nothing.
Nik the Trik said:herman said:It?s an IOU from Doug Armstrong. It?s not literally something yet, but still north of nothing.
At next year's draft, instead of the customary handshakes Dubas and crew are getting hugs.
OldTimeHockey said:It's not Cup favourites. It's conference favourites.
CarltonTheBear said:Something that needs to be said every single time these get brought up: Vegas odds makers aren't genius hockey minds who know the game in and out and have analysed every aspect of every NHL team to rank them from best to worst. These are the lines that they've set to incite the most amount of bets and to make the most amount of money for themselves on lost bets.
So yeah it can make for interesting conversation just don't treat them like more than they are.
CarltonTheBear said:Something that needs to be said every single time these get brought up: Vegas odds makers aren't genius hockey minds who know the game in and out and have analysed every aspect of every NHL team to rank them from best to worst. These are the lines that they've set to incite the most amount of bets and to make the most amount of money for themselves on lost bets.
So yeah it can make for interesting conversation just don't treat them like more than they are.