People like to heap criticism on the Leaf defenders for being ineffective puck movers, but I find myself wondering how much of that is a result of the system as opposed to the players. Sure, there is no Cale Makar back there. But the Leaf defenders are given very little in the way of time/space (because no one interferes with oncoming forecheckers) and passing options (forwards blow the zone, guy on boards gets stuffed, etc). I bet they'd look a lot better if the system was tweaked to give them more of both. I think back to how many times Tanev was absolutely hammered (often by Verhaeghe) in that Florida series last year, while Leaf forwards were prevented from doing the same. That takes a toll through the course of a game/series and I wonder if Tanev's drop off this year is a lingering result.
The resulting long stretches of in-zone defending have a ripple effect as players dump pucks in and rush to change, allowing the opponent to easily reload for another attacking sequence.
When they do have possession and fresh legs, there are still too many pointless dump-ins that are essentially give-aways. The article mentioned F3 often being too high, this is something that is really obvious with Matthews. He almost always peels off to "defend" rather than engaging in forechecking/puck battles. I know it is a fine line to walk, but it would be interesting to see what happens if he were to become more aggressive in that way.