Bender said:
Significantly Insignificant said:
L K said:
Peter D. said:
Significantly Insignificant said:
Sundin, at age 21, had a 30 game point streak. Finished with 114 points that year. However that was with the Nordiques.
The most remarkable thing about that point streak is that he is one of only three players all time to have a streak that hit 30+ games. We can guess who the other two are. Pretty heady company.
Seven games translate over a full year but he is on pace for 117 points right now
Which if Matthews gets there in his second season, well that will be amazing. The last couple of seasons there has been an average of one player getting to a hundred points, and barely beyond that. If Matthews was to get to 117, well that's when I'd start to consider putting him in the conversation with McDavid, Crosby and Karlsson.
Why does the point total need to be that high?
Well it doesn't. It was a quick and dirty post, poorly constructed because it didn't really provide any context. If he had 117 points, but he finished fifteenth in scoring, well that wouldn't be as good as getting 100 points and winning the Art Ross.
I think Matthews is a very good hockey player and he does things that very few other hockey players can do. I'm just not sure if I would put him in the McDavid, Crosby, Karlsson class, or if he will ever even get to be in that class. I think there is a lot of hype about Matthews, and it seems that people want to make him out to be better than he is at times. I find the comparisons to Lemieux and calling him a generational talent might be a bit much at this point. All I was trying to say is that if Matthews were to have an exceptional season and win an Art Ross this year while having an above normal point total for the past couple of Art Ross winners, then I would start to come around on those opinions.