• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Brad Treliving is new Leafs GM

L K said:
I get why he wouldn't fire the coach right away but I think Keefe has done all that he is going to be capable of with this team.

I mostly hate that it sets up another lame duck situation with Keefe only having 1 more season on his deal. First losing streak of the year and the calls for Keefe's head will be extreme.
 
How long's his contract, because that'll be about long it takes for me to learn it's Treliving and not Treviling.
 
Bender said:
Joe said:
Bender said:
Joe said:
bustaheims said:
Joe said:
So excited to bring in the guy who gave Kadri a ridiculous contract, lost their young superstar for ?reasons? and bungled signing their longtime star UFA player.

I?m really starting to think Shanahan may be a bit of a lunkhead.

I?m going to say having to stay in Calgary was the biggest factor for those moves. Gaudreau wanted to be closer to home and Tkachuk wanted to be not in Calgary. After that, Kadri was the best available UFA that could plug the holes left by those two wanting to not be in Cowtown. I don?t put too much on Treliving there.

I?m pretty sure Tkachuk had said he would have signed long term but the team would only offer him a bridge contract.

I?m telling you this guy is going to come in and make a terrible trade for nylander and somehow mess up the Matthews negotiation.

No one is perfect, but this whole Dubas thing is stupid. I feel this team is going to regress to Burke level mismanagement.

Because Dubas really did a masterful job at drafting, the big 3 contracts and winning playoff rounds. I'm willing to see how he does, but the implication that Dubas was some kind of GM genius in comparison that couldn't make mistakes on the big 3s second deals is ridiculous. Matthews can walk with or without Dubas, it's entirely his choice, and if Dubas were a great GM this contract expiry wouldn't even be happening right now.

This is why I?ve pretty much stopped posting here and have been rapidly losing interest in the leafs and discussing them.

Seriously. ?Winning rounds??

And I never said or even came close to implying anything about him being a ?genius?.

Fine, I'll go in a different direction. I don't think Dubas would fare any better or much differently, and I don't understand why Treliving automatically means Burke level mismanagement.

It doesn?t automatically mean anything. I?m just saying that I have a feeling.


 
CarltonTheBear said:
Pridham's value, I would hope after shadowing Dubas for the past 4 seasons, is that he's more than just a "cap guy" now. Although that's tough to say for sure since it's literally all we know about him.

I hope so too, but I was just commenting on the idea his cap management skills would be irreplaceable.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
Significantly Insignificant said:
You know MLSE, I didn't miss the Brian Burke years as much as you think I did.

I don't love the hire, but I don't think it'll be Brian Burke bad. Funny enough Dubas probably focused more on "truculence" than Treliving has the past few years.

For me it's less about what Brian Burke did, and more of just the lack of a plan or execution of one.  I look at it this way.  By all accounts, I believed that Dubas was trying to win a cup desperately.  He appeared to be learning each year and would apply that knowledge to what he wanted to do with the team the next.  I think the trade deadline this year was an example of where he may have updated his approach in the hopes of giving the team a better shot at winning the cup. 

Was Dubas perfect? No far from it.  For example, in the bubble year, where he made no moves at the deadline because he didn't think the team had much of a chance.  Okay, if you believe that, then why not trade some pieces for the future?  You knew you were going to lose Barrie for nothing.  Move him out and get something for him if you feel the team isn't where it needs to be for a long playoff run.  Still, I believed that Dubas was invested in winning a cup.

Do I think Treliving is invested in winning a cup?  I think he would like to win a cup, but he lasted 9 years in Calgary with middling results.  It strikes me as the type of guy who knows how not to rock a boat, and if that is the case, is he really the type of GM that is going to take a chance to try and put this team over the top to win a cup?
 
Significantly Insignificant said:
CarltonTheBear said:
Significantly Insignificant said:
You know MLSE, I didn't miss the Brian Burke years as much as you think I did.

I don't love the hire, but I don't think it'll be Brian Burke bad. Funny enough Dubas probably focused more on "truculence" than Treliving has the past few years.

I think the trade deadline this year was an example of where he may have updated his approach in the hopes of giving the team a better shot at winning the cup. 

Was Dubas perfect? No far from it.  For example, in the bubble year, where he made no moves at the deadline because he didn't think the team had much of a chance.  Okay, if you believe that, then why not trade some pieces for the future?  You knew you were going to lose Barrie for nothing.  Move him out and get something for him if you feel the team isn't where it needs to be for a long playoff run.  Still, I believed that Dubas was invested in winning a cup.

Do I think Treliving is invested in winning a cup?  I think he would like to win a cup, but he lasted 9 years in Calgary with middling results.  It strikes me as the type of guy who knows how not to rock a boat, and if that is the case, is he really the type of GM that is going to take a chance to try and put this team over the top to win a cup?

It's been an up and down performance in Calgary for sure. He wouldn't be the hire I'd make but I'm willing to give him a shot. I think he probably had to deal with an equal or more meddling board in Calgary. I also don't think he's exactly gunshy on a deal, so I think taking a chance isn't the issue, it's if he'll take the right one.
 
Significantly Insignificant said:
Do I think Treliving is invested in winning a cup?  I think he would like to win a cup, but he lasted 9 years in Calgary with middling results.  It strikes me as the type of guy who knows how not to rock a boat, and if that is the case, is he really the type of GM that is going to take a chance to try and put this team over the top to win a cup?

I agree that his results in Calgary are largely uninspiring, but, it's not like he didn't make major moves to try to improve the team. There a number of big trades, some impactful UFA signings, etc. He was definitely trying to win. He just didn't succeed. Whether that was on him or ownership foisting a coach upon him, or a variety of other factors is hard to say. I don't think he's the best GM, but I think his track record is being seen in more of a negative light than it probably should be. He put together a really good, competitive team in Calgary. If they were able to convert on their chances at even an average rate and got reasonable to good goaltending out of Markstrom, he'd still be with the Flames. Their xGF and xGA numbers were excellent (7th and 4th respectively). It's just that their shooting percentage was the worst in the league and their save percentage wasn't much better.
 
herman said:
BSSlEFms_o.png

https://twitter.com/bostonpizza/status/1663980092194734087
I have additional ideas for corporate synergy. Auston Pizza hat trick nights?
 
Bender said:
It's been an up and down performance in Calgary for sure. He wouldn't be the hire I'd make but I'm willing to give him a shot. I think he probably had to deal with an equal or more meddling board in Calgary. I also don't think he's exactly gunshy on a deal, so I think taking a chance isn't the issue, it's if he'll take the right one.

bustaheims said:
I agree that his results in Calgary are largely uninspiring, but, it's not like he didn't make major moves to try to improve the team. There a number of big trades, some impactful UFA signings, etc. He was definitely trying to win. He just didn't succeed. Whether that was on him or ownership foisting a coach upon him, or a variety of other factors is hard to say. I don't think he's the best GM, but I think his track record is being seen in more of a negative light than it probably should be. He put together a really good, competitive team in Calgary. If they were able to convert on their chances at even an average rate and got reasonable to good goaltending out of Markstrom, he'd still be with the Flames. Their xGF and xGA numbers were excellent (7th and 4th respectively). It's just that their shooting percentage was the worst in the league and their save percentage wasn't much better.

I appreciate your point of view.  Still can't help but feel that the garlic pan bread with cheese from Jack Astor's was ordered, and we ended up with melba toast.
 
Under the circumstances, it could have been worse. Can't say I'm thrilled or super excited.
It's not JFJ or Gord Stellick. It's not Sam Pollack either. I have mixed feelings about him.

They needed to get someone quickly. They did that. I like that he's got a month before July 1st to figure some things out.
Following a minor pro hockey career, he has about two decades in NHL management.
He seems to be well regarded around the league. Many of the Calgary fans still like him and felt his selection of coaches was his biggest shortcoming.
He's a good communicator with the media which, as JFJ could tell us, is important in Toronto.

He has a very short runway to a very difficult job. Fingers crossed.
 
It's funny how a team's success is on the GM, when we're talking about GMs. When we're talking coaches, it's on the coach. GMs are only one small part of the team. They may do the best job ever and if the other pieces don't pull their weight, it's not the GM's fault.  It seems clear to me that Sutter was the problem in Calgary last year at least.
 
The more I think about this, the more I see Treliving not being the sexy pick, but the safe pick.  Hope he is able to get this team to take the next step.
 
I do feel he might do something big, though. Some kind of big trade.

No idea what it will be, though. But bigger than Nylander just.
 
Back
Top