GhostofPotvin29
New member
pnjunction said:This is what I don't get about this apologist line of thinking. In one post it is "they're bigger than us what do you expect"...then when I say well that sucks it is "we're not too small and soft to beat them". The response to criticism oscillates between excuses and denials but when all you want are some results, results that were all but promised, it is infuriating. It seems the excuses and denials are endless but the results never come.
This is not about you Burke is blowing the same smoke, mr not a five year rebuild criticizing a lack of patience. We had it, you spent it.
You said they 'manhandled' us, which I assume meant were more physical/stronger than the Leafs - which I don't think is surprising and I think is likely to be expected coming into a game against Boston. Looking at the two rosters I would not expect us to 'manhandle' Boston.
Nowhere did I say that because a team is bigger than us that we can't beat them - hence why I said both teams were similar last season and we beat them. We have enough speed to beat the Bruins, we have played terribly against them this season and let them manhandle us physically and on the scoreboard most times out this season.
I don't think it is apologist to say we are not as big or physical as Boston, it's just common knowledge.
But I have never cared about being labelled an 'apologist' so label away.