• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Jays acquire Troy Tulowitzki

Nik the Trik said:
There is no one defensive statistical standard though. Baseball Reference has Tulo's defense as almost a full win better than Reyes' this year by their dWAR.

Sure, but if he was a clear defensive upgrade, there'd be more consensus among the defensive metrics. To me, that says the defensive upgrade he represents in comparison to Reyes is questionable.
 
bustaheims said:
Sure, but if he was a clear defensive upgrade, there'd be more consensus among the defensive metrics. To me, that says the defensive upgrade he represents in comparison to Reyes is questionable.

Except I think even the most fervent advocate of defensive metrics will tell you that one year samples are pretty unreliable when it comes to getting a clear picture on a player's overall defense and Tulowitzki's career defensive numbers are significantly better than Reyes'.

The years where Tulowitzki was winning gold gloves his defense graded out as being pretty terrific and on a level that Reyes never really reached. So the evidence is pretty good for him being a substantial defensive upgrade.
 
Nik the Trik said:
The years where Tulowitzki was winning gold gloves his defense graded out as being pretty terrific and on a level that Reyes never really reached. So the evidence is pretty good for him being a substantial defensive upgrade.

He may have been, but I feel like injuries have had an impact on his range. His hip and groin have taken a lot of damage over the past few years.
 
bustaheims said:
Nik the Trik said:
The years where Tulowitzki was winning gold gloves his defense graded out as being pretty terrific and on a level that Reyes never really reached. So the evidence is pretty good for him being a substantial defensive upgrade.

He may have been, but I feel like injuries have had an impact on his range. His hip and groin have taken a lot of damage over the past few years.

Range is kind of a tricky concept defensively though. There's Robbie Alomar kind of range where he could run across the diamond and make the play and there's Cal Ripken range where because of his arm he could play deeper than most SS and make plays that other guys would have to dive for look easy. Alomar showed upon highlight reels, Ripken easily graded out as being the superior defensive player.

Tulowitzki's always been more of a Ripken-type so issues regarding footspeed don't particularly concern me and his defense registered as so good just a year ago that I'm fairly confident he can more or less still be that player.
 
No biggie, only Devon Travis and Jose Bautista have left tonight's game with injuries.

Seriously, it's messed up the stuff that happens to this team.  They never have a season where things just fall into place or are fortunate.
 
Potvin29 said:
No biggie, only Devon Travis and Jose Bautista have left tonight's game with injuries.

Seriously, it's messed up the stuff that happens to this team.  They never have a season where things just fall into place or are fortunate.

Please, every team has these issues at some time during the season. Complaining about injuries and their division is not only a cop-out but it's entirely misinformed.
 
I don't know if I'd say it's a cop-out but I really don't think the only team that plays on turf, a team that we hear multiple guys every year say they don't want to go because of the effect turf has on a body, can really look skyward when nagging mid-season injuries pile up.

Stroman was bad luck, guys getting little tweaks as the season wears on can be easily hung on the team dragging their feet on getting a grass field down.
 
Nik the Trik said:
I don't know if I'd say it's a cop-out but I really don't think the only team that plays on turf, a team that we hear multiple guys every year say they don't want to go because of the effect turf has on a body, can really look skyward when nagging mid-season injuries pile up.

Stroman was bad luck, guys getting little tweaks as the season wears on can be easily hung on the team dragging their feet on getting a grass field down.

Doesn't Tampa play on turf too?  I'm sure there's some differences to it but until recently I thought they were one of the consistently healthiest teams.

But of their significant injuries this season - Stroman, Saunders, Reyes, Travis, Bautista, it would be hard to really say any are turf related at all: 2 happened in ST, Travis had a ball hop into his collarbone in Cleveland then reaggravated it swinging, Reyes hurt himself on a check swing in Baltimore, Bautista hurt himself trying to make a crazy outfield throw, etc.

Did the early 90s Jays teams chronically have these issues?
 
Potvin29 said:
But of their significant injuries this season - Stroman, Saunders, Reyes, Travis, Bautista, it would be hard to really say any are turf related at all: 2 happened in ST, Travis had a ball hop into his collarbone in Cleveland then reaggravated it swinging, Reyes hurt himself on a check swing in Baltimore, Bautista hurt himself trying to make a crazy outfield throw, etc.

If you listen to players describe it, the effects of playing on turf are gradual and add to the load of wear and tear the body goes through over the course of a season.

Like I said, Stroman is bad luck but all teams have bad luck like that. Pulls and strains and the like are part of the cumulative effect of the playing surface.
 
You know what else doesn't help? The team making players play through significant injury. Like having Reyes play a full week with a freaking broken rib. Both EE and Bautista have had serious injuries this year without missing much more than a few days out of the lineup. Ultimately these players end up with, shocker, further injury down the road.
 
Bautista chimes in about the trade:

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/video/bautista-questions-tulowitzki-trade~667112
 
Frank E said:
Bautista chimes in about the trade:

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/video/bautista-questions-tulowitzki-trade~667112

Pretty much what everyone has said.  We need pitching.  AA said we needed pitching at the end of the season last year.  He still hasn't added that pitching. 10-22 in 1-run games.  4-36 in games where the offense scores 3 or fewer runs.  The offense can't score 10 runs every game and when they don't the pitching can't hold anything.

While adding a starter is a guy who only performs once every 5 games, the Jays can't keep throwing out Estrada/Hutchinson/Doubront who go 3 innings and overtax an already mediocre bullpen.  We are running with Dickey, Buehrle and a little bit of Estrada right now to hold the team up.  AA better find a way to add a starter or two or this season is done.
 
L K said:
Frank E said:
Bautista chimes in about the trade:

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/video/bautista-questions-tulowitzki-trade~667112

Pretty much what everyone has said.  We need pitching.  AA said we needed pitching at the end of the season last year.  He still hasn't added that pitching.

I think that the Jays need pitching is the consensus, but I'm not sure Bautista needs to be saying that kind of thing.  It's just not a good thing for the clubhouse.

Didn't he say something similar last year?
 
Frank E said:
L K said:
Frank E said:
Bautista chimes in about the trade:

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/video/bautista-questions-tulowitzki-trade~667112

Pretty much what everyone has said.  We need pitching.  AA said we needed pitching at the end of the season last year.  He still hasn't added that pitching.

I think that the Jays need pitching is the consensus, but I'm not sure Bautista needs to be saying that kind of thing.  It's just not a good thing for the clubhouse.

Didn't he say something similar last year?

And while I don't think the pitching is very good, I think it's also been blown a little out of proportion and they've also got unlucky to some degree.

I mean, look at this:

@james_in_to

Jays now 14-33 in games decided by two or fewer, a .298 winning percentage, fifth lowest since 1901.

@james_in_to 

Last time a team had a sub .300 win percentage in games decided by two or fewer were the '93 Mets. Other 3 teams all before '40s.

Just like the Orioles a couple years ago had a crazy good record in 1-run games, I think it's basically the opposite happening to the Blue Jays right now.  A blog looked into the Orioles that season, who went 29-9 in 1-run games and concluded:

What we see definitely backs up the logic:
*Elite one-run game performance appears to be random.
*It is somewhat more predictable when actual talent level is figured in.
*That is, very good teams will do slightly better in close games because they are, well, better, and...
*Very bad teams will also do slightly worse in close games because they are, well, worse.

...

The only things I could think of that may predict one-run game success is a very strong bullpen or an excellent tactician on the bench. The latter is impossible to measure, though I?d guess Buck Showalter falls somewhere short of "master strategist." As for the bullpen, well, I wasn?t going to pull reliever data for 2332 team seasons, but I DID pull it for the last three years (90 team seasons). Bullpen FIP had an 11.5% R2 with one-run game winning percentage, even stronger than the previous year?s Pythagorean winning percentage. It appears bullpen FIP, though not terribly predictive, is at least somewhat of a signal of one-run game capability. Unfortunately for the Orioles, their bullpen was merely average with a 3.68 FIP, so it doesn?t appear they have an edge there, either.

So, all of this is to confirm what we already knew ? the Orioles, despite being a decent team with a decent bullpen last year, played WAY above their heads in one-run games. It?s not even remotely sustainable.

If you want to read whole thing: http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2013/3/15/4105922/one-run-game-performance-unsustainable-orioles

Here's another from the same site looking at whether a great bullpen can change that:

The correlation between the two variables is so low that the coefficient of determination (R-squared) is almost zero and it is difficult to differentiate the line of best fit from the gridline. The slope of this line is also extremely low, which again shows that having an elite duo or trio of relief pitchers does not affect a team?s win-loss record in one-run games.

Perhaps the biggest differences come from the Miami Marlins and Seattle Mariners. Miami, featuring a top three of Steve Cishek, Bryan Morris, and Mike Dunn that has combined for exactly three WAR, has a winning percentage of .627 in one run games. Contrarily, the Mariners? trio of Fernando Rodney, Danny Farquhar, and Brandon Maurer has been worth 3.2 WAR this season, but the Mariners own a paltry .378 winning percentage in one run games. Additionally, the Mariners have the second highest total bullpen WAR in Major League Baseball, so the theory that pitchers other than Rodney, Farquhar and Maurer blow the games does not hold water.

Many have suggested that winning one-run games is not a sustainable skill but rather the result of random chance. This brief study supports that hypothesis by showing that even a dominant bullpen cannot help teams gain an edge in such contests. The Royals may have won seven of their last eight one run games and the bullpen may have pitched well in those games, but strength of bullpen is not a predictor of or way to ensure sustained success in such contests. One-run games are essentially a coin flip, and sometimes, due to basic laws of probability, a coin will land on the same side seven out of eight times. We should not be shocked by this and should avoid crediting someone or something for the success (or blaming for the failure, in the case of the teams playing the Royals), as either luck or something other than quality of relief pitchers is the driving force in the results of such games.

http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2014/8/22/6055447/the-effect-of-a-good-bullpen-in-one-run-games

Jays expected W-L Pythagorean record right now is 60-41.  Instead they are 50-51.  Toronto sports!
 
But most of this gets broken down to...the pitching isn't good so their offensive production is being marginalized.  Pitching in high leverage situations our pitchers struggle.  Pitching with a 10-run lead they do well.  It really doesn't matter what the Jays record COULD be.  The reality is that unless the offense becames consistent and scores 5+ runs every game instead of having games where they score 10 runs and then 1-4 runs at other times OR the pitching isn't able to hold teams to 3 or fewer runs on a more consistent basis, the team is going to lose more games than they win.  It's not new for this organization.  They have been below average in 1-run game performance for years.  One-off years of statistical variance, sure, that's bad luck.  When it's an annual problem it is a problem with the pieces you put out on the field.
 
Frank E said:
I think that the Jays need pitching is the consensus, but I'm not sure Bautista needs to be saying that kind of thing.  It's just not a good thing for the clubhouse.

I'm guessing that what he's saying reflects the mood within the clubhouse already.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Frank E said:
I think that the Jays need pitching is the consensus, but I'm not sure Bautista needs to be saying that kind of thing.  It's just not a good thing for the clubhouse.

I'm guessing that what he's saying reflects the mood within the clubhouse already.

I'm sure that guys like Felix Doubront and Aaron Loup don't want to hear it, but that's because they haven't been good and threats to lose their job.
 
Frank E said:
L K said:
Frank E said:
Bautista chimes in about the trade:

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/video/bautista-questions-tulowitzki-trade~667112

Pretty much what everyone has said.  We need pitching.  AA said we needed pitching at the end of the season last year.  He still hasn't added that pitching.

I think that the Jays need pitching is the consensus, but I'm not sure Bautista needs to be saying that kind of thing.  It's just not a good thing for the clubhouse.

Didn't he say something similar last year?

Maybe somebody has to say it? The pitching staff is awful and, as LK pointed out, AA has mentioned this repeatedly for the past two years and hasn't done anything to rectify it. Bautista signed away his entire prime years to stay with Toronto on a hugely team-friendly deal and he hasn't been close to playing one playoff game. Why can't he voice his concerns?
 
L K said:
But most of this gets broken down to...the pitching isn't good so their offensive production is being marginalized.  Pitching in high leverage situations our pitchers struggle.  Pitching with a 10-run lead they do well.  It really doesn't matter what the Jays record COULD be.  The reality is that unless the offense becames consistent and scores 5+ runs every game instead of having games where they score 10 runs and then 1-4 runs at other times OR the pitching isn't able to hold teams to 3 or fewer runs on a more consistent basis, the team is going to lose more games than they win.  It's not new for this organization.  They have been below average in 1-run game performance for years.  One-off years of statistical variance, sure, that's bad luck.  When it's an annual problem it is a problem with the pieces you put out on the field.

And this is it exactly.

And that's also why you can't just simply look at superficial stats. Wow, they have a great run-differential. That's almost meaningless. It's all about context. The bullpen is responsible for the 2nd most blown saves in all of baseball and they also have the least amount of saves in all of baseball. That's not being unlucky, that's having a raw bullpen that can only pitch well when the game isn't on the line.
 
Andy007 said:
Frank E said:
L K said:
Frank E said:
Bautista chimes in about the trade:

http://www.tsn.ca/mlb/video/bautista-questions-tulowitzki-trade~667112

Pretty much what everyone has said.  We need pitching.  AA said we needed pitching at the end of the season last year.  He still hasn't added that pitching.

I think that the Jays need pitching is the consensus, but I'm not sure Bautista needs to be saying that kind of thing.  It's just not a good thing for the clubhouse.

Didn't he say something similar last year?

Maybe somebody has to say it? The pitching staff is awful and, as LK pointed out, AA has mentioned this repeatedly for the past two years and hasn't done anything to rectify it. Bautista signed away his entire prime years to stay with Toronto on a hugely team-friendly deal and he hasn't been close to playing one playoff game. Why can't he voice his concerns?
The contract extension Bautista received was a bit of gamble at the time for the Blue Jays. Bautista's numbers were off the charts compared to the rest of the career and no one knew if he could continue to put up similar numbers. Obviously, it has worked out for the Jays.

I personally think he talks to much, about the team, about the umpires, and what he thinks the team needs. He can talk but do it in the clubhouse not to the media. I would be discouraged as a depth/fringe pitcher by his comments. I honestly am not convinced he's a good teammate. There has always seemed to be problems in the clubhouse and he is supposed to be the leader. His numbers are unreal but I wish her would tone down all the talk.
 
Back
Top