Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Peter D. said:
Quite bluntly, the way this entire situation has played out from all parties involved, Dubas comes out looking like a conniving little b!tch.
Well, I wouldn't use that term but what happened to "I absolutely wouldn't take any other job right now"?
During his press conference with the Pens, he said that his wife thought that he should at least talk with Pittsburgh and Fenway after they called as they're a good city and organization. His oldest child is about to start grade one. As they were going to have to move to another city eventually, his wife felt they might as well get it done now to reduce turmoil on his kids. His wife and kids flew down and the Pens did a major effort to show them around the city to get the=m comfortable, etc.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Honestly, that fateful press conference he gave was a disaster. To me, he doesn't come out of all this as a guy who's fully mature, despite his being savvy in so many ways.
I also feel he is not the most mature person.
Fact: Both Shanahan and Dubas agreed he had an offer to renew from the Leafs as of his Monday year end press conference.
Fact: By the following Friday, both Shanahan and Dubas agreed that Leafs withdrew that offer.
Fact: During the Pens press conference, Dubas suggested that he was "too honest" during his final press conference with the Leafs - an admission of an error on his part.
Claim: According to Shanahan, when Dubas & he discussed the situation the Wednesday after the press conference, he was left with more questions than answers (which would erode confidence in Dubas). The next day, Dubas' agent asked for significantly more money as Dubas emailed that he wanted to return as Leafs GM.
In order for the Leafs to withdraw their offer, Dubas had top have done something to put Shanahan and/or MLSE off.
Good faith negotiations theoretically start with the parties some distance apart. As they negotiate, which Shanahan claimed had been going on with Dubas' agent for a couple of months, they get to understand the other side's position, etc and then tend to move towards a compromise between the two positions. To bump the dollars substantially further apart or raise new substantial issues at a late stage could be construed as not good faith negotiations. They should have been on the table much sooner.
Shanahan maintained money was not the key issue. Something else bothered him.
Media reports were that Dubas wanted more power that either cut Shanahan out or increased Dubas' decision making authority over the hockey team (probably at the expense of Shanahan).
Media reports and statements were that the Pens wanted to find a GM first. Then they would double back and add a President. Penguins trying to sign Dubas, change course and offer him more authority as President and interim GM - which corroborates the Toronto media reports of Dubas' desire for more decision making power to some considerable extent.
There is a common protocol in business: when a senior manager asks for something significant and they're turned down, it can be like a vote of non-confidence in parliament. It's time for a new 'election' for the position but the incumbent isn't invited to be on the ballot because faith in him/her has been lost or compromised.
These developments have me more sympathetic to Shanahan and MLSE than I already was. If Shanahan's claims are true and as of today, there is more evidence to corroborate them, I probably would have withdrawn the offer to Dubas too.