Coco-puffs
New member
CarltonTheBear said:Coco-puffs said:Gardiner-Zaitsev sport at 43.8% CF% (46.25% SZV adj.) and a 37.5% GF% with a normal PDO of 99. Small sample size of course, and granted they have led most of those games but overall, Rielly-Zaitsev looks like the better long term play based on CF% being more predictive of future success.
It's definitely too early to read into the GF% right now. The raw stats are just 3 for and 5 against, so really one good game could push them back up to 50% (or one bad could make it look significantly worse). All in all a 2.60 GA/60 together is actually pretty good. It's the GF side of the equation that needs some work. Rielly-Zaitsev was sporting a 5.35 GA/60 in February/March before the break-up.
As for CF%, yeah it's not great. Jake got absolutely shellacked in the games against TB, BOS, and NSH. If the pairing stayed together and we got more data would we see those as outliers eventually or are we predicting that he'll be under 27% in 3 out of every 8 games? I don't know, but I think it's definitely too early to make any definite statements about this.
I was being hyperbolic with my last statement to be honest. I'm not really drawing any definitive conclusions so far either. I just wanted to point out that Gardiner switching with Rielly may have led us to more wins, but I'm not so sure Gardiner-Zaitsev is really how we want to move forward long term for our top pair. (ie, assuming we aren't acquiring someone to join our Top-4)