Patrick said:
The best players in the NHL are the best players because they routinely make opposition defenders(note other teams top defenders too) look terrible.
If Dion Phaneuf was as bad as some here think then he'd be torched every single night, truth is he shuts the best players in the league down almost nightly.
Since 2010-2011
Sidney Crosby: 15 points in 10 games vs. Leafs
Evgeni Malkin: 13 points in 11 games vs Leafs
Steven Stamkos: 19 points in 17 games vs. Leafs
John Tavares: 17 points in 14 games vs. Leafs
Alex Ovechkin: 17 points in 15 games vs. Leafs
So, actually, when the best players in the league come to town they eat our lunch just like they would with anyone else.
Regardless, if Phaneuf were getting turned inside out by Crosby or Malkin I think most people would be relatively alright with those results vs. those players and while some of Phaneuf's physical limitations are troubling him getting walked around isn't really the problem. It's the mental stuff, stuff that he should be able to fix, that isn't really developing. If every Leaf is going to be judged based on the "They're never going to rebuild so we should really be asking who's most likely to take the team to getting knocked out in the second round" criteria then Phaneuf does need to turn into a guy who makes a lot fewer mental errors, especially considering the leadership role he's in.
Patrick said:
Without Phaneuf, someone else has to play against the leagues best and we have nobody capable of doing that the way Dion does.
Which is really only the point if someone is actively speaking for another of the Leafs defense to be taking on his responsibilities. I know it doesn't get explicitly spelled out in every post about Phaneuf but I really think it's fair to assume that when people are evaluating him it's in a leaguewide or historical context rather than stewing over just how much better he is than Korbinian Holzer.
Now, I would be the first to admit that I have a complete lack of understanding of pro hockey and the responsibilities and results of a first pairing defenseman but from my position of relative ignorance it seems to me that we might not be able to judge Phaneuf on that curve. At 7 million per Phaneuf's value to the team isn't just about his relative competence to the other defensemen on the team and, to some extent, it's not even about him vs. other "top-pairing" defensemen. The Leafs are only going to be able to pay a few players the kind of money Phaneuf is getting and for them to be competitive he's got to provide good value for his price point.