Kin
New member
McGarnagle said:I don't see much comparable between Rielly and Kaberle other than they both play(ed) defense. Kaberle was a passer, and a great one; you'd never see him jump into a rush, and if he ever shot the puck, it was a complete last resort.
Rielly on the other hand pinches a great deal, joins the rush, skates out the puck, shoots, and while not a physical dman, at least takes the body routinely along the boards.
Besides, if they were that comparable, at least half the board would have suggested that the team consider moving Rielly to forward by now.
I don't know if it's true that Kaberle would never join the rush. It was definitely a part of his game.
But otherwise I think maybe there's something to be said that Rielly should maybe take a bit of a cue from Kaberle and how he played. The two of them have pretty comparable numbers through their first three years. 19 goals and 92 points for Rielly, 17 goals and 107 points for Kaberle. Kaberle scored a few more points because he got more ice time and was on a better team but it's pretty comparable.
Rielly did shoot a little more(although Kaberle's reluctance to shoot is exaggerated) but it didn't lead to much in the way of goals or points. Kaberle's gpg in those three years and Rielly's are virtually identical(Rielly with a slight edge, .081 to Rielly's .076).
I think that's because despite the fact that they're not all that stylistically similar, they share an important weakness. I don't think either guy has a particularly good shot, the difference being Kaberle was smarter about using it. Kaberle was tremendously smart about his shot and when to use it in a way that the dummies in the stands yelling at him to shoot didn't understand. Kaberle wasn't a threat to score 15+ a year but most defensemen aren't.
If Rielly gets a little more judicious with his shot he might score 10-12 a year but his assists should jump more to Kaberle's level.