Kin
New member
BlueWhiteBlood said:I'm still rubbing Burke's feet.
Well, at least it's his feet this time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BlueWhiteBlood said:I'm still rubbing Burke's feet.
Chev-boyar-sky said:I haven't seen it mentioned yet in this thread but one thing that struck me about Schenn is/was how absolutely terrible his shot from the point is/was.
Not sure I've seen something that bad at the NHL level.....ever.
princedpw said:Beowulf said:I'm not exactly pleased with this deal, pretty meh, doesn't solve anything. While you could argue JVR has higher upside, he also has far more question marks than Schenn, who could still develop into a stud shutdown guy.
All I can say right now is that if JVR coming spells the end for Kulemin it's a big, big mistake.
I'm hoping this deal has nothing to do with Kulemin. IMHO, Kulemin's our best defensive winger. I dont think JVR is going to supplant Kulemin in that respect.
Chev-boyar-sky said:I haven't seen it mentioned yet in this thread but one thing that struck me about Schenn is/was how absolutely terrible his shot from the point is/was.
Not sure I've seen something that bad at the NHL level.....ever.
Etiam Vultus said:princedpw said:Beowulf said:I'm not exactly pleased with this deal, pretty meh, doesn't solve anything. While you could argue JVR has higher upside, he also has far more question marks than Schenn, who could still develop into a stud shutdown guy.
All I can say right now is that if JVR coming spells the end for Kulemin it's a big, big mistake.
I'm hoping this deal has nothing to do with Kulemin. IMHO, Kulemin's our best defensive winger. I dont think JVR is going to supplant Kulemin in that respect.
I think that Kulemin was miscast as a second line player. He should be playing on a shut-down third line that plays against the other team's top line and can still generate some offense.
princedpw said:Chev-boyar-sky said:I haven't seen it mentioned yet in this thread but one thing that struck me about Schenn is/was how absolutely terrible his shot from the point is/was.
Not sure I've seen something that bad at the NHL level.....ever.
That's not a bad observation but it probably just means that Schenn won't ever be a great pp point producer. The make-it-or-break-it aspect of Luke's game involves his defensive play. (His overall even strength offensive play already seems to be more than adequate in a role as a top 4 defenseman: ~20-25 even strength points is actually quite remarkable given his icetime).
Jolly good show chaps said:Evening chaps. What is JVR's cap hit v Schenn's?
Heroic Shrimp said:Chev-boyar-sky said:I haven't seen it mentioned yet in this thread but one thing that struck me about Schenn is/was how absolutely terrible his shot from the point is/was.
Not sure I've seen something that bad at the NHL level.....ever.
I've always felt it was because he seems to play with a longer stick than is suitable for his height. It seems to me he elects to play with a longer stick for defensive advantage, but at the expense of the shot.
I was always a defensive defenseman, and I always elected to use a longer stick than my height warranted. Defensively, it was a big help, but my shot was always weak and awful, very much the beer league version of Schenn's. One day, I started using the standard length of stick and my shot improved instantly and markedly.
princedpw said:Etiam Vultus said:princedpw said:Beowulf said:I'm not exactly pleased with this deal, pretty meh, doesn't solve anything. While you could argue JVR has higher upside, he also has far more question marks than Schenn, who could still develop into a stud shutdown guy.
All I can say right now is that if JVR coming spells the end for Kulemin it's a big, big mistake.
I'm hoping this deal has nothing to do with Kulemin. IMHO, Kulemin's our best defensive winger. I dont think JVR is going to supplant Kulemin in that respect.
I think that Kulemin was miscast as a second line player. He should be playing on a shut-down third line that plays against the other team's top line and can still generate some offense.
I think Grabbo's line was that 2-way shut down line.
Van Riemsdyk, unlike Schenn, however, is a positive possession player, with a 5.8 Corsi rate over 43 games last season, scoring 11 goals. He also faced very tough competition, a .816 Corsi Rel QoC. He hovered about even over lesser competition last season.
Schenn's possession rates were brutal last year and he was likely mis-cast as a defensive defenceman. There are all the tools for a very good NHL defenceman there, but he worked himself into an unfortunate situation by playing poorly for three of his four seasons. It's very unfortunate that the Maple Leafs rushed him to the NHL, and then signed him to that deal, but he has a chance to live up to his potential in a different place.
As a No. 2 overall pick, James van Riemsdyk's development has been heavily scrutinized over the years. After last year's playoff run, people had very high hopes for him, and most of the comments I hear this year are from people who are disappointed that he hasn't had a 70-plus point breakout superstar season.
That's a shame, because he has quietly taken a very nice step forwards in just about every measure.
At 5-on-5, last year he averaged 9.0 shots on goal per 60 minutes played; this year he's up to 11.0 SOG/60. That's a 22 percent increase, which is very good -- even among young, improving forwards, not many players increase their shot rate that much in a single year.
...
This year, van Riemsdyk is taking on somewhat tougher competition (his Corsi Rel QoC is up from 0.663 to 0.789). He is doing it with weaker linemates -- no offense to Wayne Simmonds or Jakub Voracek, but last year van Riemsdyk's most common linemates were Mike Richards, Jeff Carter and Claude Giroux.
And yet despite those added challenges, if van Riemsdyk were getting the same luck on his own shots as he had last year, his goal-scoring rate would be up by about 20-25 percent. If he were getting the same luck on his teammates' shots as he had last year, his assist rate might be up by 40-50 percent.
That would put him on pace for something like 29 goals and 60 points over an 82-game season, which certainly shouldn't be a disappointment -- in fact, it's awfully good for someone who's only playing 15:20 per game.
Luke Schenn's Corsi Relative QualComp: -0.154, worse than D Mike Komisarek. JvR? +0.816. Second best F for Flyers last year(43 GP).
Luke Schenn stats: faced ~2nd/3rd pair competition this year, had worst Corsi of any Toronto defenseman.
lc9 said:This is a good trade for the leafs. Schenn is a pylon out there and we needed a big skilled forward.
Love this deal.