Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And, even trading Murray doesn't feel like the smartest move. Better to have a veteran as the #3 goalie in the playoffs and let the young guys run the show for a potential Marlies playoff run.So we're going through a tough injury situation with the forwards.
Meanwhile, some of the media is trying to trade away the goalie depth in the AHL.
If the two goalie prospects continue to do well along with Murray, trading Murray might be something to consider closer to the deadline.
Some of the chatter here seems premature - like they can't find anything of substance to talk about.
Ditto for the speculation on Marner's contract or Tavares' contract.
The goalie trade that haunts me (and probably most) is Rask for Raycroft and keeping Pogge.Trading our two younger goalies seems silly at this point. It's not a relevant move this year but Hildeby:Akhtyamov/Stolarz might be a relevant repeat of Sparks/McElhinney where the correct move might be moving the older goalie to create a roster spot for a younger guy ready for the NHL.
Significantly agree. It depends on what would be coming back. If Murray got them a decent 2 way center with some/a little term on a decent contract, I'd at least think about that one. If you're down to a #3 in the playoffs, you're not likely going to win a Cup anyway. So running out one of the kids in a #3 role doesn't seem so bad to me.And, even trading Murray doesn't feel like the smartest move. Better to have a veteran as the #3 goalie in the playoffs and let the young guys run the show for a potential Marlies playoff run.
If one of the young goalies being moved brings back an equally young impact player, that's one thing. But, moving them for a rental should be an easy no.