Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
L K said:What the hell Masai
Nik the Trik said:Apparently the Raptors were in on Ibaka, offering the #9 pick for him. Considering what OKC got for him though, I'm glad the Raptors didn't try to beat it.
Loser: Toronto Raptors
Someone should?ve told the Raptors that even though they owned New York?s pick, they didn?t actually have to draft like the Knicks. One of the classic James Dolan?era transactions is acquiring a player who was really good five years ago (hey, Derrick Rose!), and the Raptors might?ve just one-upped the Cablevision scion: They drafted a guy who would?ve been a nice centerpiece ? in 1996. Now, there was plenty of draft-night chatter about how Utah?s Jakob Poeltl was the safest pick, but when a top-tier NBA team lands a lottery pick, does it really need a likely bench guy who can be legitimately described as Tyler Zelleresque? Unlike most franchises in the top 10, an already-good team like Toronto can afford to take a high-variance player. After winning 56 games, you almost never get chances like this, and the Raptors cashed in their ticket on a back-to-the-basket center with athleticism issues. ? R.O.
Nik the Trik said:The Ringer has us as one of the Draft's Losers which is pretty hard to argue with. Their reasoning is pretty solid:
Loser: Toronto Raptors
Someone should?ve told the Raptors that even though they owned New York?s pick, they didn?t actually have to draft like the Knicks. One of the classic James Dolan?era transactions is acquiring a player who was really good five years ago (hey, Derrick Rose!), and the Raptors might?ve just one-upped the Cablevision scion: They drafted a guy who would?ve been a nice centerpiece ? in 1996. Now, there was plenty of draft-night chatter about how Utah?s Jakob Poeltl was the safest pick, but when a top-tier NBA team lands a lottery pick, does it really need a likely bench guy who can be legitimately described as Tyler Zelleresque? Unlike most franchises in the top 10, an already-good team like Toronto can afford to take a high-variance player. After winning 56 games, you almost never get chances like this, and the Raptors cashed in their ticket on a back-to-the-basket center with athleticism issues. ? R.O.
https://theringer.com/nba-draft-winners-and-losers-24249a04abb7#.5skhzi7ad
Toronto Raptors
Round 1: Jakob Poeltl, C, Utah (9); Pascal Siakam, PF, New Mexico State (27)
Round 2: N/A
Grade: A-
With the almost certain departure of Bismack Biyombo in free agency, the Raptors needed front court depth, and they got it with these two picks.
While Poeltl is a different player altogether from Biyombo, he should come in and be able to provide offense from Day 1.
Siakam meanwhile eventually could take on more of a Biyombo role as an "energy and hustle" guy, after averaging almost 12 boards a game in college last year.
Coco-puffs said:Nowhere else have I heard that Poeltl has athleticism issues. Everyone says he has good foot speed and mobility, but lacks a bit of leaping ability. When you're 7 ft tall with a huge wingspan, leaping ability is the least of concerns.
Nik the Trik said:And while I think there's probably some truth to the idea that the team needed front court depth, you really have to ask yourself if that's what you want to use a top 10 pick on vs. swinging for the fences and landing someone with a better chance of being an all-star type.
CarltonTheBear said:So this is basically selecting Frederik Gauthier but 10+ picks earlier?
CarltonTheBear said:Nik the Trik said:And while I think there's probably some truth to the idea that the team needed front court depth, you really have to ask yourself if that's what you want to use a top 10 pick on vs. swinging for the fences and landing someone with a better chance of being an all-star type.
So this is basically selecting Frederik Gauthier but 10+ picks earlier?
Heroic Shrimp said:So, is Jared Sullinger any good...?