Redleaf
Active member
Kessel Run said:I just don't understand.....
Unless the prognosis on Gunnarsson's hip is not good...
From what I can gather, they just wanted more toughness and better stay-at-home defenseman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Kessel Run said:I just don't understand.....
Unless the prognosis on Gunnarsson's hip is not good...
bustaheims said:Real_ESPNLeBrun: Leafs retained $200,000 of cap hit in Polak-Gunnarsson deal
Ahh, Nonis, the gift that keeps on giving. To other teams.
lamajama said:From what reports I see he stays at home because by the time he skates to the offensive end the play is already back in his own end.
RedLeaf said:Kessel Run said:I just don't understand.....
Unless the prognosis on Gunnarsson's hip is not good...
From what I can gather, they just wanted more toughness and better stay-at-home defenseman.
CarltonTheBear said:Frank E said:That doesn't make it sustainable though. There has to be some reasoning here, and I hope it's more than just the RHS issue if Franson is indeed gone.
He's a right shot, he's big and he's tough. Seriously anybody who doesn't think that's enough of a reason for the Leafs to trade him for Gunnarsson hasn't been paying attention.
BrownRolo said:RedLeaf said:Kessel Run said:I just don't understand.....
Unless the prognosis on Gunnarsson's hip is not good...
From what I can gather, they just wanted more toughness and better stay-at-home defenseman.
Polak has worse defensive numbers on a much better club playing against easier opponents. How exactly does that make him better?
wnc096 said:CarltonTheBear said:Frank E said:That doesn't make it sustainable though. There has to be some reasoning here, and I hope it's more than just the RHS issue if Franson is indeed gone.
He's a right shot, he's big and he's tough. Seriously anybody who doesn't think that's enough of a reason for the Leafs to trade him for Gunnarsson hasn't been paying attention.
Agreed. Leafs D was soft as hell. Good move
Potvin29 said:When I think of team issues, being "soft" isn't one of them. Gleason was supposedly this tough presence and I thought he was brutal.
Potvin29 said:When I think of team issues, being "soft" isn't one of them. Gleason was supposedly this tough presence and I thought he was brutal.
bustaheims said:Potvin29 said:When I think of team issues, being "soft" isn't one of them. Gleason was supposedly this tough presence and I thought he was brutal.
Yup. Toughness is an overrated concept. I mean, yes, teams and players need to be able to play a physical game and react appropriately when other teams to the same, but, things like speed, skill and smarts are much more important at every position. I don't care how many hits a guy is credited with or how many shots he blocked. What's important is how he plays with the puck and how effective he as at preventing the other team from having it - and, in general, guys who rack up a lot of hits and blocked shots are pretty poor at that, because, well, you can't legally hit players when they don't have the puck and you can't block shots when your team has the puck.
Potvin29 said:bustaheims said:Potvin29 said:When I think of team issues, being "soft" isn't one of them. Gleason was supposedly this tough presence and I thought he was brutal.
Yup. Toughness is an overrated concept. I mean, yes, teams and players need to be able to play a physical game and react appropriately when other teams to the same, but, things like speed, skill and smarts are much more important at every position. I don't care how many hits a guy is credited with or how many shots he blocked. What's important is how he plays with the puck and how effective he as at preventing the other team from having it - and, in general, guys who rack up a lot of hits and blocked shots are pretty poor at that, because, well, you can't legally hit players when they don't have the puck and you can't block shots when your team has the puck.
Yeah I see it as a factor but as a complementary asset to a player who should be either good enough or not good enough without having to use toughness as a reason. Some players (like Orr) exist only because of toughness, some players were seemingly drafted because it was thought their toughness would give them an edge (Biggs comes to mind) but I think it should be pretty low on the list of traits you're looking for in a player.