Redleaf
Active member
pmrules said:Bender said:MotM: Kadri
HM: Scrivens
Same here....
Make it so number one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pmrules said:Bender said:MotM: Kadri
HM: Scrivens
Same here....
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:MotM: Kadri HM Kostka
Make it a double. But I almost gave Komisarek the HM.
EDIT: Kessel was good too. Kadri, Kostka, Komisarek, Kessel, Komarov were good. Kulemin was bad. Kaneuf was up and down.
Nik Pollock said:Kadri, on account of scoring a goal and bouncing Markov's head off the glass
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:MotM: Kadri HM Kostka
Make it a double. But I almost gave Komisarek the HM.
EDIT: Kessel was good too. Kadri, Kostka, Komisarek, Kessel, Komarov were good. Kulemin was bad. Kaneuf was up and down.
awesome post!! Kudos!
I forgot to mention Khavanov. He's an excellent addition to the D.
dappleganger said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:MotM: Kadri HM Kostka
Make it a double. But I almost gave Komisarek the HM.
EDIT: Kessel was good too. Kadri, Kostka, Komisarek, Kessel, Komarov were good. Kulemin was bad. Kaneuf was up and down.
awesome post!! Kudos!
I forgot to mention Khavanov. He's an excellent addition to the D.
It's no longer 2006.
dappleganger said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:LittleHockeyFan said:MotM: Kadri HM Kostka
Make it a double. But I almost gave Komisarek the HM.
EDIT: Kessel was good too. Kadri, Kostka, Komisarek, Kessel, Komarov were good. Kulemin was bad. Kaneuf was up and down.
awesome post!! Kudos!
I forgot to mention Khavanov. He's an excellent addition to the D.
It's no longer 2006.
Also, instead of the column "longest accolade streak" as in years past, let's have one that tallies the number of times a player gets votes in the MotM voting. That way, guys who get named a lot but may fall short in the MotM or HM voting will get some credit for having played well. (This doesn't count toward the final point total.)
Crucialness Key said:Also, instead of the column "longest accolade streak" as in years past, let's have one that tallies the number of times a player gets votes in the MotM voting. That way, guys who get named a lot but may fall short in the MotM or HM voting will get some credit for having played well. (This doesn't count toward the final point total.)
I really like this addition... it's like a version of what I suggested earlier but without overhauling the entire points structure, which is probably the wiser choice. I'm interested to see what results we get.