L K said:
Highlander said:
My Uncle was the top Pharmaceutical salesman in Canada back in the 50-60's for Roussel. No education but a helluva personality, today you need medical degrees to sell pharma drugs. Lets face it, it is as big a business of oil and the lobbies in the U.S. are scary. If we find a cure for cancer will it be released or buried, I have my questions on these things.
Digging up an old comment but this is
honestly frustrating when I read stuff like this. No-one is suppressing a treatment for cancer. You can't cure, to the point of eradication, DNA damage. It's not like Polio or Small pox where it's an actual foreign pathogen.
Anyone who doesn't believe that there has been no "cancer cure" suppression in medical history is na?ve.
Throughout time, there have been many stories and documentations of individuals -- medical people be it researchers, doctors, etc., people such as Canada's heroic nurse Rene? Caisse, who was brutally suppressed by being harangued in various ways by the then Ontario government of the day, the cancer establishment, for having given people hope with a formula called Essiac. There was more than documented evidence, proof actually, that it helped people with cancer.
The above is just a case in point. There are countless others. The Cancer Treatment Centers of America, with their comprehensive approach to cancer, (which includes yes, naturpathic medicine), first started up in Zion, Illinois. They were warned not to open such a clinic, but they plowed on and expanded their facilities. While they don't prefess to 'cure' all cancers, they give people the hope with their unique approach to cancer therapy including using various applications with Chemotherapy modalities, and the latest technologies (Cyberknife, Cryotherapy, Tomotherapy, IORT, etc.).
It doesn't take 100 years of purported cancer research to focus on how best to deal with this dreaded malady. Only because of the advent of technology, has research obviously spearheaded. Still, throughout the histories, there has been suppression of a various kind. Remember Pasteur vs Bechamps? Pasteur's version of the theory of disease, by his own admission, was flawed. Bechamps was not. The pharmaceuticals took Pasteur's theory (of treating the symptoms and not the root cause) as it worked very well for them (drug-wise & profit-wise).
Bechamps was villified, discredited, and left dispirited by this establishment.
(in later years, Pasteur, then retired and not involved with the medical community anymore, asked how everything was going as surely people's health must be improving, curing whatever ailed them, etcetera. Much to his consternation, he found out that the opposite was quite true. Taking it upon himself to do his own quiet research of this whole medical picture, he soon realized the truth of the times, and in his own words uttered the foolowing: "Andre (Bechamps) was right and I was wrong. The germ is nothing, the milieu is everything. My God, what Have I unleashed!").
I don't personally believe in one cancer cure. That doesn't make any sense. The one size fits all does not, not just for cancer, but towards other disease mechanisms. As Roy Rife noted, (another story of suppression here by the AMA & co.), using the then Rife Microscope, looking right down to the "ocean floor" of the cancer specimen, the cancer virus is not dead even if on the surface it appears dormant. He discovered a way to render these cancer cells dead, (controversial at the time), and he also discovered that pigs carried the cancer virus.
(More than a few years ago, doctors noted that Jewish people had the lowest rates of cancer of any cultural group, and it's more than coincidence doctors said, that they don't eat pork. Italians ironically had one of the highest. Deli pork products have been highly consumed on the Italian menu). Don't know if this is still applicable today with emphasis on healthier eating and overall general well-being. If the cultural pendulum is the same or has shifted....
Anyways, what's irksome is when one says there is no cancer suppression, as if there had never been. Wake up! It was there and perhaps today it may not be as prevalent anymore, since diabetes is now being called the next epidemic.