• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2011 Blue Jays/MLB Thread

Busta Reims said:
Floyd said:
Ah, right. Sorry. OPS pretty much covers it all, doesn't it?

Pretty much. The only things it doesn't really take into account are runs, RBIs and SB, though, you can get a feel for how good a player will be at the first two from it.

I have a soloution for the SBs... Just add them to the TBs in one's SLG% and presto...  OPSASB (adjusted for SBs.)  :D
 
Saint Nik said:
Floyd said:
Ah, right. Sorry. OPS pretty much covers it all, doesn't it?

It does, but it has it's flaws. It doesn't adjust for park factors or league conditions and a lot of people think that it over-emphasizes SLG% when OBP is a more important component.

Yeah, that's an interesting dilema... Not much you can do about park factors and such. 
 
hockeyfan1 said:
Babe Ruth has the highest career OPS at 1.1636. He is followed by Ted Williams and Lou Gehrig.

Barry Bonds stands fourth in the rankings for career OPS with a 1.0533 measurement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCMA_5nK_G0
 
Floyd said:
Yeah, that's an interesting dilema... Not much you can do about park factors and such.

Well, in theory that's what OPS+ is. It's OPS, with league conditions/park factors accounted for, expressed against the major league average.
 
Floyd said:
hockeyfan1 said:
Babe Ruth has the highest career OPS at 1.1636. He is followed by Ted Williams and Lou Gehrig.

Barry Bonds stands fourth in the rankings for career OPS with a 1.0533 measurement.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCMA_5nK_G0

Why do you always have to make things racial.
 
Saint Nik said:
Floyd said:
Yeah, that's an interesting dilema... Not much you can do about park factors and such.

Well, in theory that's what OPS+ is. It's OPS, with league conditions/park factors accounted for, expressed against the major league average.

Which is so flawed I think... Like I mean, weather is a huge factor and take Colorado for example...  Are we measuring the stats on days when the balls are being dried out in a humidor or not? Who knows what some other parks are up to.   
 
Floyd said:
Which is so flawed I think... Like I mean, weather is a huge factor and take Colorado for example...  Are we measuring the stats on days when the balls are being dried out in a humidor or not? Who knows what some other parks are up to. 

Well, park factors are looked at over a period of years so, assuming global warming isn't wreaking things already, weather is going to remain pretty stable from city to city and will factor into offensive performance at the various home parks.

Likewise, assuming they dry out the balls to a consistent extent over a period of a few years then Colorado's park factor will account for the different conditions.

Park Factors

It's a math heavy read but a worthwhile one. Park factors tend to be pretty sound.
 
Saint Nik said:
Floyd said:
Which is so flawed I think... Like I mean, weather is a huge factor and take Colorado for example...  Are we measuring the stats on days when the balls are being dried out in a humidor or not? Who knows what some other parks are up to. 

Well, park factors are looked at over a period of years so, assuming global warming isn't wreaking things already, weather is going to remain pretty stable from city to city and will factor into offensive performance at the various home parks.

Likewise, assuming they dry out the balls to a consistent extent over a period of a few years then Colorado's park factor will account for the different conditions.

Park Factors

It's a math heavy read but a worthwhile one. Park factors tend to be pretty sound.

Good grief. I threw in the towel at step 3.
 
The most recent Elias estimations have been release at MLBTR, and, post-trade, Johnson is a borderline Type A in the AL and Hill is barely a Type B in the NL. They could both easily drop in rank before the season ends, but, with Johnson, the Jays are at least guaranteed an opportunity at a compensation pick - it's pretty much impossible for him to not at least end up as a Type B. Hill, on the other hand . . . if he doesn't have a very good 6 weeks in Arizona/very good playoffs if they qualify, I'm not sure he'll even get a major league contract this winter.
 
Busta Reims said:
The most recent Elias estimations have been release at MLBTR, and, post-trade, Johnson is a borderline Type A in the AL and Hill is barely a Type B in the NL. They could both easily drop in rank before the season ends, but, with Johnson, the Jays are at least guaranteed an opportunity at a compensation pick - it's pretty much impossible for him to not at least end up as a Type B. Hill, on the other hand . . . if he doesn't have a very good 6 weeks in Arizona/very good playoffs if they qualify, I'm not sure he'll even get a major league contract this winter.

So, should we fail to (or choose not to) re-sign Johnson, it boils down to trading 6 weeks + a post season's worth of McDonald for a pick.... and McDonald is a virtual slam dunk to re-sign with us anyway. I guess there's not much to dislike about the trade. Again though, I just wish we knew who was going to be at 2B going forward. 
 
Escobar-Johnson... where have I seen that DP combo before?  ;)

I really like both guys.  KJ actually has a solid eye and some good power for a second baseman.  He suffers from some inconsistency and for whatever reason is having a pretty lousy year (well, other than power).  I think he can be a .280 guy and take some walks so it's a nice low risk move imo.  AA is buying KJ cheap (which seems to be AA's MO).  I'd certainly have made this move also.

Changing subjects here... For NL ROY... out of Freddie Freeman and Craig Kimbrel.  Who would you pick?  (Nik, remember the Freeman discussion we had before?  Well I was clearly wrong).
 
Erndog said:
Changing subjects here... For NL ROY... out of Freddie Freeman and Craig Kimbrel.  Who would you pick?  (Nik, remember the Freeman discussion we had before?  Well I was clearly wrong).

I'll be honest, I don't remember it at all so I don't know if you're being sarcastic.

Kimbrel's WAR(using BR's formula) is 2.9, Freeman's is 1.6 and I'm inclined to agree with that. Vance Worley is at 2.4 and, all things being equal, I'd be inclined to go starter over reliever so to me it's more of a Worley-Kimbrel discussion right now.
 
Saint Nik said:
Erndog said:
Changing subjects here... For NL ROY... out of Freddie Freeman and Craig Kimbrel.  Who would you pick?  (Nik, remember the Freeman discussion we had before?  Well I was clearly wrong).

I'll be honest, I don't remember it at all so I don't know if you're being sarcastic.

Kimbrel's WAR(using BR's formula) is 2.9, Freeman's is 1.6 and I'm inclined to agree with that. Vance Worley is at 2.4 and, all things being equal, I'd be inclined to go starter over reliever so to me it's more of a Worley-Kimbrel discussion right now.

Was a real convo.  Too bad we can't go back to look at it.  I basically said I was a little more tempered with my expectations of Freeman than many Braves fans.  We even quickly discussed a Freeman vs. Dominic Brown as well (in which, you were wrong ;)).

Anyways, Worley's certainly been great but I have a hard time giving ROY to a #4/5 starter on such a good team.  I guess it's not his fault he is behind all those guys but still something to be said for the everyday player (Freeman) compared to the once a week guy (Worley) or the every second day but an inning guy (Kimbrel).

I think it's pretty close between those 3 and will probably come down to September.
 
Erndog said:
Anyways, Worley's certainly been great but I have a hard time giving ROY to a #4/5 starter on such a good team.  I guess it's not his fault he is behind all those guys but still something to be said for the everyday player (Freeman) compared to the once a week guy (Worley) or the every second day but an inning guy (Kimbrel).

Personally, I've never thought that the ROY should have anything to do with a player's teammates, good or bad. It should strictly be an evaluation of a guy in his rookie season and how he's played.

The issue with Freeman is that I don't think he's separated himself from the pack in terms of the other rookie position players having good years. His 1.6 WAR has him tied with Danny Espinosa and Wilson Ramos and Darwin Barney is just behind that. I think Collmenter is the #3 guy with Kimbrel and Worley right now.
 
Saint Nik said:
Erndog said:
Anyways, Worley's certainly been great but I have a hard time giving ROY to a #4/5 starter on such a good team.  I guess it's not his fault he is behind all those guys but still something to be said for the everyday player (Freeman) compared to the once a week guy (Worley) or the every second day but an inning guy (Kimbrel).

Personally, I've never thought that the ROY should have anything to do with a player's teammates, good or bad. It should strictly be an evaluation of a guy in his rookie season and how he's played.

The issue with Freeman is that I don't think he's separated himself from the pack in terms of the other rookie position players having good years. His 1.6 WAR has him tied with Danny Espinosa and Wilson Ramos and Darwin Barney is just behind that. I think Collmenter is the #3 guy with Kimbrel and Worley right now.

You may be right.  I'd have Freeman as #2, maybe 3, but as of right now I'd have Kimbrel as the ROY.  He's having a historic season really.  He's having the type of year a closer would normally get some Cy Young votes for let alone ROY. 

He hasn't given up an Earned Run since June 11.  A span of 33 appearances (32 2/3rd innings).  He will likely end the year with 50+ saves, and close to 150 strikeouts.  Those are some pretty absurd numbers for anyone let alone a rookie.
 
Jays defeated Kansas City Royals 4-3 Wednesday night, at home.  Jos? Bautista with his league-leading 37th homerun, and Brett Lawrie with his fourth homerun this year, that provided the winning run.  Jays much-improved starter Ricky Romero who did not finish, gave way to Jesse Litsch and Casey Jannsen, before Frank Francisco got the save.

Source:  Sportsnet
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top