But that's why I don't really get it. I mean, I'm sure its being used as some form of culture change because of the failed playoff runs, but if the faces in the room are the same I just don't really see the point. If they hand it back to Thornton it is just a tedious exercise and if they don't, I just don't really see why they can't just say "we want to try a different approach". I mean, what is a 35 year old Joe Thornton going to show in training camp as a leader that is going to be any different from any other year?
That's mostly what I don't really get. I mean ultimately the captain drops the ceremonial puck, has added media responsibility and talks to the ref regarding questionable on ice calls. At its worst you risk pissing off Thornton/Marleau with this move and the best case scenario is you market Couture or Vlasic as your next captain. I just don't really see the benefit from something that amounts to an insiginficant change in the performance of the team.