• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2018-19 Toronto Maple Leafs - General Discussion

herman said:
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/draglikepull/status/1057630311339778048

Spooky.

I was wondering after one game (and after several others) where Zaitsev made a Zaitsev pass, that this might just be someone who needs corrective lenses (or laser surgery). It could just be astigmatism or something innocuous that causes him to miss his mark so often.
I use to think that Phaneuf needed glasses, constantly being so out of position. I wondered if literally couldn't see his opponents. Turns out he just sucks.
 
https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1057656840820084736

*Hyman on the PP alert*

I actually don't think this is a terrible idea, although PP2 ain't scoring anyway so what's the point.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
I was wondering after one game (and after several others) where Zaitsev made a Zaitsev pass, that this might just be someone who needs corrective lenses (or laser surgery). It could just be astigmatism or something innocuous that causes him to miss his mark so often.

I'd be pretty surprised if this wasn't something the Leafs tested during their medical exams.

edit: These guys perform "annual Vision Screenings for the Toronto Maple Leafs during pre season Training Camp since 2006. Also provides comprehensive eye examinations for executives of the Toronto Maple Leafs and its hockey players".

Oh yeah, physicals are a thing.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1057656840820084736

*Hyman on the PP alert*

I actually don't think this is a terrible idea, although PP2 ain't scoring anyway so what's the point.

Anyone remember those heady days, so long ago now, when our PP was unstoppable and our forward depth the toast of 5 continents?
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
CarltonTheBear said:
https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1057656840820084736

*Hyman on the PP alert*

I actually don't think this is a terrible idea, although PP2 ain't scoring anyway so what's the point.

Anyone remember those heady days, so long ago now, when our PP was unstoppable and our forward depth the toast of 5 continents?

Wait. How many Leafs are injured? Just 1??
 
https://twitter.com/NickDeSouza_/status/1057685964582199296

What a world of difference the increase in skating proficiency has made in Gauthier's game.
 
herman said:
https://twitter.com/NickDeSouza_/status/1057685964582199296

What a world of difference the increase in skating proficiency has made in Gauthier's game.

I have no power to make this happen, but it is my wish that on the very rare occasion that Gauthier should score in Toronto, the fans all start bleating like goats.

If I were dying, it would be my Make-A-Wish.
 
Heroic Shrimp said:
I have no power to make this happen, but it is my wish that on the very rare occasion that Gauthier should score in Toronto, the fans all start bleating like goats.

If I were dying, it would be my Make-A-Wish.

I knew you were trouble when you walked in.
 
princedpw said:
herman said:
https://twitter.com/NickDeSouza_/status/1057685964582199296

What a world of difference the increase in skating proficiency has made in Gauthier's game.

Small sample size alert.

Similar to the passing stats, there are so many shot attempts within a quarter of a season that the data is already fairly normalized, barring a drastic change in deployment and usage.

Right now, Gauthier is starting most of his shifts in his own zone and ending most of his shifts in the opponents' zone and nobody getting many shots through, let alone scoring.

For a 4th line, this is an acceptable level of effectiveness. Adding Engvall at some point might also tip the balance towards good. As much as I'd like overmatch scoring to come from the 4th line, if they're only afforded 10ish minutes, I'm okay with them costing pennies and nullifying all hockey-related activities for their ice time.
 
herman said:
Similar to the passing stats, there are so many shot attempts within a quarter of a season that the data is already fairly normalized, barring a drastic change in deployment and usage.

Well, we're not quite yet at the quarter mark of the season, are we?

Also, in this case sample size doesn't just mean games played. We also have to realize that we're dealing with a pretty small amount of total shot attempts in Gauthier's stats because of his low minutes. A 57% CF sounds amazing, sure. But if you look at the raw numbers you'll find that on average the shot attempts while he's on the ice are only about 8-6 per game in Toronto's favour. I mean that's nice and all but a 57% CF for a 15-minute a night player is a completely different thing than a 57% CF for a 8-minute a night player.
 
https://twitter.com/StapeAthletic/status/1058004638643953665
This Q&A is a worthwhile read if you're interested in analytics but not really into the mathy side of things.

The Leafs are the only team to publicize that they've used Clear Sight's shot analytics data.

You might remember Steve Valiquette's name from the Royal Road article I've posted here previously.

He talks about how his post-retirement career takes the lessons he learned as a backup goaltender to cut through the noise of the NHL's public stats.

What I?ve really come to understand from doing this project is that we can?t live by what?s counted for as shots on goal in an official capacity. The only way you can be 100 percent accurate is if you have two sets of eyes on every game ? live on the game and then another person on the computer reconciling what?s coming in. We have first, second and third looks at every chance. Our numbers will never be the same as the NHL?s. And we?re OK with that because we?re doing the due diligence that needs to be done. This affects shooting percentages, save percentages, things that are coming into play when contracts are being discussed.

Distance from the net, plus deflections on the ice don?t go in as frequently as ones off the ice. It wasn?t really that hard of a save. When you look at our designations, your goalie can never let a red one in. You need saves on the yellow ones and you can live with goals on the green ones because you?re only supposed to give up maybe six a night. And one of every three of the high-percentage shots goes in every night. One of three, one of three ? breakaways, odd-man rushes, broken plays, it always comes back to that range.

That last part might give an indication as to why the Leafs have overused the stretch pass play. When it works, it's a 27-30% chance at a goal. When it doesn't, it's the puck in a reset position. What they need to do more is use a larger variety of plays to take advantage of a defense that is defending the stretch pass (a la football runs vs throws).

He also addresses my least favourite play of all:
Forward down low curls up and feeds a pass low to high for a defenseman to reset the cycle, but the defenseman fires a screen-free slapper at the goalie. This is Roman Polak and Ron Hainsey in a nutshell.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
Similar to the passing stats, there are so many shot attempts within a quarter of a season that the data is already fairly normalized, barring a drastic change in deployment and usage.

Well, we're not quite yet at the quarter mark of the season, are we?

Also, in this case sample size doesn't just mean games played. We also have to realize that we're dealing with a pretty small amount of total shot attempts in Gauthier's stats because of his low minutes. A 57% CF sounds amazing, sure. But if you look at the raw numbers you'll find that on average the shot attempts while he's on the ice are only about 8-6 per game in Toronto's favour. I mean that's nice and all but a 57% CF for a 15-minute a night player is a completely different thing than a 57% CF for a 8-minute a night player.

That's very fair to say. The linked Twitter thread posted a video from 2015 and Dubas' take on Gauthier's numbers back then show he was already pretty positive about what Gauthier brings to the table; there's quite a sample size by now. It's definitely worth anybody's time to scroll through that thread's highlights to see some of the reasons why the numbers are shaking out that way.

Babcock said recently that he always expected Gauthier would show better in the NHL rather than the lower leagues. I took that to mean Gauthier plays the way Babcock likes in his non-scorers: structurally obedient, greater coverage than average, super super boring; in the NHL where it is a lot less chaotic, that's going to have an effect. Gauthier can't shoot worth a lick, but he really does know how to position his body, keep his stick on the puck, and cut off passing lanes. Even though hockey is not his one true love, I can see he definitely has hockey smarts to work with (didn't he turn down an Ivy League school? I guess that's sort of not smart).

With the Barb-boost to his skating, his body is now catching up with his mind. With NHL-ish wingers, and NHL-ish structure, Gauthier is starting to be able to assert himself on the ice the way he has with the Marlies. In other words, he's dependable and because scoring is usually an accident for him, he will always be very cap friendly.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top