Kin
New member
RedLeaf said:Completely agree. But let's face it... everybody is expecting a 1st round victory.
As they were last year, which is why it's foolish to make that mistake again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RedLeaf said:Completely agree. But let's face it... everybody is expecting a 1st round victory.
Nik said:RedLeaf said:Completely agree. But let's face it... everybody is expecting a 1st round victory.
As they were last year, which is why it's foolish to make that mistake again.
herman said:https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1392142918195023883
RedLeaf said:The rest of that thought was less about expectations and more about...What are we left with if they don't?
Can't see them putting Hyman on LTIR now so there's no way Freddie is getting into a game for the Leafs this week. Looks like Foligno is on one of the top 2 lines and so is Hyman.CarltonTheBear said:herman said:https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1392142918195023883
Hmmmm
Nik said:RedLeaf said:Completely agree. But let's face it... everybody is expecting a 1st round victory.
As they were last year, which is why it's foolish to make that mistake again.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I make a distinction between expecting something and being overconfident that it will happen.
Foligno wasn't putting up anymore points then Nash per 60 in CBJ. Anyway lots of people here think you don't need offence on that line. It's def a good looking shutdown line though. Lots of speed from Kerfoot and Mik. I honestly don't remember Nash as a player.CarltonTheBear said:https://twitter.com/kristen_shilton/status/1392154292820316168
Well I was close. If that 3rd line is being used as a checking unit then I think it needs Hyman or Foligno there. If it isn't being used as a checking unit then it probably doesn't have enough offence on it. Still time to move things around though so we'll see what happens.
Bullfrog said:What's amazing is if you click on Foligno's face here, his expression never changes. Talk about consistency:
https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=80212
Keefe said he wanted to get Foligno with Tavares before he got injured so now he'll the chance. Let's see what happens but it's nice to have usable options and not just warm bodies for hopefully a long run.herman said:I think it's about getting Foligno, noted Swiss Army utility forward and older Hyman, some reps with all of the top 6 before the playoffs, and getting Nash's legs under him again. Kerfoot can be unleashed offensively, so to speak, with much of the defensive responsibility being covered by Nash and Mikheyev (reverse top-6 build). It gives all lines a carrier or two.
The old man line looks to be playing more of a bench mascot role that might wreck a matchup once in awhile with an OZ start; it'll be a huge boost if that line scores at any point.
Nik said:Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:I make a distinction between expecting something and being overconfident that it will happen.
I think maybe the distinction I'm making is between thinking something is more likely than not to happen and expecting it to happen. If I roll the dice I'm confident it's more likely to come up 7 than any other number but I certainly don't expect it to be 7.
L K said:Yep, I'll give Pridham his due on this one but I don't see how you fit those guys under the cap. That's going to be some exceptional fancy math if this one works out.