Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frank E said:Wait Wait Wait...hold on...Klingberg to LTIR is all good and fine.
But be don't have a problem with Jarnkrok right!!?
cabber24 said:LTIR doesn't mean he's done for the season? I honestly don't think it's a good look that seemingly bad contracts end up on the LTIR in Toronto. Players may hesitate to sign a prove-it contract with Toronto, it could turn into a playing career death sentence.
I guess it makes sense that their worst players are terrible because they're actually hurt. Can Reeves have a flair-up of something too?CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:LTIR doesn't mean he's done for the season? I honestly don't think it's a good look that seemingly bad contracts end up on the LTIR in Toronto. Players may hesitate to sign a prove-it contract with Toronto, it could turn into a playing career death sentence.
They should be fine as long as they don't have a degenerative hip issue.
cabber24 said:I guess it makes sense that their worst players are terrible because they're actually hurt. Can Reeves have a flair-up of something too?CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:LTIR doesn't mean he's done for the season? I honestly don't think it's a good look that seemingly bad contracts end up on the LTIR in Toronto. Players may hesitate to sign a prove-it contract with Toronto, it could turn into a playing career death sentence.
They should be fine as long as they don't have a degenerative hip issue.
Thrilled to be able to allocate the cap somewhere else. From an on-ice perspective, this helps the Leafs immensely.
CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:I guess it makes sense that their worst players are terrible because they're actually hurt. Can Reeves have a flair-up of something too?CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:LTIR doesn't mean he's done for the season? I honestly don't think it's a good look that seemingly bad contracts end up on the LTIR in Toronto. Players may hesitate to sign a prove-it contract with Toronto, it could turn into a playing career death sentence.
They should be fine as long as they don't have a degenerative hip issue.
Thrilled to be able to allocate the cap somewhere else. From an on-ice perspective, this helps the Leafs immensely.
I mean it wouldn't be shocking at all if Reaves ends up on LTIR eventually. He's already not NHL caliber, and I have to imagine the rest of the league sees that too. So eventually push will come to shove and the Leafs will be forced to waive him. Will Reaves want to play a season or two in the AHL after 800+ NHL games, or will he say that a nagging hand injury from 20 years of punching people has made it difficult for him to hold a hockey stick and he needs to go on IR?
Perhaps he can be kept on as locker room DJ.herman said:CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:I guess it makes sense that their worst players are terrible because they're actually hurt. Can Reeves have a flair-up of something too?CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:LTIR doesn't mean he's done for the season? I honestly don't think it's a good look that seemingly bad contracts end up on the LTIR in Toronto. Players may hesitate to sign a prove-it contract with Toronto, it could turn into a playing career death sentence.
They should be fine as long as they don't have a degenerative hip issue.
Thrilled to be able to allocate the cap somewhere else. From an on-ice perspective, this helps the Leafs immensely.
I mean it wouldn't be shocking at all if Reaves ends up on LTIR eventually. He's already not NHL caliber, and I have to imagine the rest of the league sees that too. So eventually push will come to shove and the Leafs will be forced to waive him. Will Reaves want to play a season or two in the AHL after 800+ NHL games, or will he say that a nagging hand injury from 20 years of punching people has made it difficult for him to hold a hockey stick and he needs to go on IR?
Weird equipment skin rash is also an option
herman said:CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:I guess it makes sense that their worst players are terrible because they're actually hurt. Can Reeves have a flair-up of something too?CarltonTheBear said:cabber24 said:LTIR doesn't mean he's done for the season? I honestly don't think it's a good look that seemingly bad contracts end up on the LTIR in Toronto. Players may hesitate to sign a prove-it contract with Toronto, it could turn into a playing career death sentence.
They should be fine as long as they don't have a degenerative hip issue.
Thrilled to be able to allocate the cap somewhere else. From an on-ice perspective, this helps the Leafs immensely.
I mean it wouldn't be shocking at all if Reaves ends up on LTIR eventually. He's already not NHL caliber, and I have to imagine the rest of the league sees that too. So eventually push will come to shove and the Leafs will be forced to waive him. Will Reaves want to play a season or two in the AHL after 800+ NHL games, or will he say that a nagging hand injury from 20 years of punching people has made it difficult for him to hold a hockey stick and he needs to go on IR?
Weird equipment skin rash is also an option
CarltonTheBear said:https://twitter.com/markhmasters/status/1728108174027419673
I do think Klingberg being perma-LTIR'd isn't a sure thing yet. My completely unqualified opinion would be they'll probably wait a month or so, maybe until January at the latest, to see if regular treatments can sort out his issues before deciding if some sort of season ending surgery would be necessary. So obviously I wouldn't expect any trades until after that. Who knows though.
2. There will be a process for John Klingberg, Toronto and the possibility he is shut down for the season. The Maple Leafs historically are very creative with long-term injury use over the years, and not everybody loves to see it. Klingberg?s legitimately injured, believed to be his hip, something he?s dealt with before.
Unfortunately, it is worse, and even though he wants to play, he is not expected to return. However, until there is a clearer picture of treatment and road to recovery, they won?t be able to declare him unable to return. Whatever the case, there will be cap flexibility at least in the short-term.
herman said:CarltonTheBear said:https://twitter.com/markhmasters/status/1728108174027419673
I do think Klingberg being perma-LTIR'd isn't a sure thing yet. My completely unqualified opinion would be they'll probably wait a month or so, maybe until January at the latest, to see if regular treatments can sort out his issues before deciding if some sort of season ending surgery would be necessary. So obviously I wouldn't expect any trades until after that. Who knows though.
32 Thoughts
2. There will be a process for John Klingberg, Toronto and the possibility he is shut down for the season. The Maple Leafs historically are very creative with long-term injury use over the years, and not everybody loves to see it. Klingberg?s legitimately injured, believed to be his hip, something he?s dealt with before.
Unfortunately, it is worse, and even though he wants to play, he is not expected to return. However, until there is a clearer picture of treatment and road to recovery, they won?t be able to declare him unable to return. Whatever the case, there will be cap flexibility at least in the short-term.
Apparently, Friedman mentioned on his latest podcast that the Leafs had to jump through a lot of hoops to prove Murray was unable to resume play and there was a similar 'quiet' period around his status during the offseason, so we're likely getting a similar situation with Klingberg. I haven't heard that segment myself yet.
From EF...Goaliedave31 said:I still don't understand why they signed Klingberg instead of Dumba. Definitely makes one question Treliving's ability to assess the needs of this team.
Guilt Trip said:From EF...Goaliedave31 said:I still don't understand why they signed Klingberg instead of Dumba. Definitely makes one question Treliving's ability to assess the needs of this team.
"I think the guy they really wanted on July 1st was Dumba," Friedman said. "I think they were in on him. Klingberg came in at $4.15 million, Dumba ended up in Arizona for $3.9 million, but I think at the time he was high in the fives (5 million range). I think Toronto really wanted him and they couldn't get the deal done because they couldn't fit Dumba where he wanted to be...
"He was the guy (Toronto) talked to. He was the guy they wanted. But they couldn't fit him in for what he was asking."
herman said:Erik Gustafsson would?ve been the offensive puck mover to keep. Cheap, plays both positions, can move up the lineup for a spell or two. Would?ve enjoyed the Sweden trip.