OldTimeHockey
Active member
Would Colbourne not of been lost on waivers? I mean, wasn't that the thought at the time anyways?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OldTimeHockey said:Would Colbourne not of been lost on waivers? I mean, wasn't that the thought at the time anyways?
Andy007 said:OldTimeHockey said:Would Colbourne not of been lost on waivers? I mean, wasn't that the thought at the time anyways?
He would have been lost to waivers only if they wanted to send him to the Marlies.
Personally I was of the opinion that it wouldn't have been a problem keeping him on in a bottom 6 role, particularly since the abysmally useless McLaren and Orr are occupying said spot(s).
wnc096 said:Potvin29 said:CaptainObvious said:That Colburne trade is biting us in the behind region already...
This is one of the reasons a number of people did not like moving him. Didn't mean we thought he was going to be an all-star, but he's certainly capable of being one of the best bottom 6 forwards on the team. I didn't like basing it on his pre-season play, just like when a player has a great pre-season and can't duplicate it. It sucks that now this has happened and he's not around to fill in when he should be.
I don't think we are missing out on too much....I have season tickets to the Flames. Most nights I have to check the program half way through the game to see if he's playing. Completely invisible most of the time. Can't imagine that he would be any kind of savior...
That's a pretty fair assessment.Potvin29 said:wnc096 said:Potvin29 said:CaptainObvious said:That Colburne trade is biting us in the behind region already...
This is one of the reasons a number of people did not like moving him. Didn't mean we thought he was going to be an all-star, but he's certainly capable of being one of the best bottom 6 forwards on the team. I didn't like basing it on his pre-season play, just like when a player has a great pre-season and can't duplicate it. It sucks that now this has happened and he's not around to fill in when he should be.
I don't think we are missing out on too much....I have season tickets to the Flames. Most nights I have to check the program half way through the game to see if he's playing. Completely invisible most of the time. Can't imagine that he would be any kind of savior...
I've got Gamecenter Live so I've been trying to watch some Flames games to get a look at him, and that hasn't been my impression. I don't think anybody thinks he would be a saviour, and I purposely tempered what I said about his potential impact - but from what I've seen of him in Calgary he's perfectly capable of filling in better than probably anyone else in the system right now. He's been playing over 10:00 per night in 9 of 13 games with Calgary and at least 15:00 in each of the last 4. He may never turn into what was hoped, but he's still got more natural and physical talents than any center's left in the system.
I think he's actually performed quite well in Calgary and looks better each game. For his sake, hopefully the points come for him playing with Cammalleri.
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:So is this the same injury as Karlsson's?
Highlander said:Karlson was out 10 weeks with an Achilles, hopefully this is less. Thank god it wasnt the Achilles
Potvin29 said:I'm not a doctor (but I play one on here) but I'm guessing multiple months he'll be out?
Potvin29 said:Highlander said:Karlson was out 10 weeks with an Achilles, hopefully this is less. Thank god it wasnt the Achilles
I don't think it's necessarily Achilles = more missed time than another tendon, but that an Achilles would be a much harder injury to come back from.
I think he could be out longer than Karlsson was.
Boston Leaf said:Wait Frederick Gauthier can fill in that role..No problem
CaptainObvious said:http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=435811
Bolland's injury
Madferret said:The main thing Karlsson had going for him was his age. Tough one for Bolland.