Kin
New member
LuncheonMeat said:I applaud Tim Murray for sticking to his guns and no giving total personnel permission and control to Babcock. Looks like that was the deal breaker in Buffalo.
I think what's so funny about this narrative being pushed is that it really does reflect on the "Babcock doesn't want to be GM!" stuff that a lot of people here were saying. I think it comes from a misconception of what being a GM is. A lot of people think it's just wining and dining free agents or making exciting decisions at draft day or dreaming up trades and then calling it. But I suspect stuff like that takes up a tiny amount of time of a GM's time. I suspect way more of it has to do with the minutiae of contract negotiations and being aware of what's going on with the affiliates and, in most markets, co-ordinating promotions and sales. It's not playing NHL '15 on Franchise mode.
So when Mike Babcock would say "I don't want to be a GM," I think that's the sort of stuff he was talking about. He wants to concern himself with the team he's coaching. He doesn't want to have to know about what's going on in Grand Rapids all the time or whether or not a player showed up to sign sticks for a charity auction.
But the idea that he wouldn't want the power to say something like "Hey, see that guy on the second line dragging ass? Let's trade him." I mean, I don't buy that any coach wouldn't want that.
And all that does is speak to what we all knew about the Toronto GM situation. Whoever they hire, heck if they'd kept Nonis there, they're not going to be running the team that way Tim Murray is running the Sabres. They're going to be another nuts and bolts guy.
So, and forgive me for feeling a little vindicated today, the Leafs did offer Babcock a very unique opportunity. He could come here, have a lot of control over player decisions and still not be the GM.