Kaberle15
Active member
If that happens, I'm just hoping that the same guy who picked Pogge over Rask is not picking...BlueWhiteBlood said:And then who else goes? Reimer or Scrivens?
Anyway, no deal for Luongo, please.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that happens, I'm just hoping that the same guy who picked Pogge over Rask is not picking...BlueWhiteBlood said:And then who else goes? Reimer or Scrivens?
BlueWhiteBlood said:Corn Flake said:Luongo for Connolly and Liles.
Nucks get a centre and some defensive mobility, we send them a long-ish contract we probably don't need going forward, which helps offset the Luongo contract.
That's about the only deal I'd consider for Luongo and even at that, I would still regret the 10 years on his deal and dry heave every time I look at the cap.
And then who else goes? Reimer or Scrivens?
lamajama said:I don't know if he's coming or not but hold out until Gillis folds. Apparently he has good reputation for some reason but if you look at his body of work meaning his draft record, his UFA signings etc its not very impressive
nutman said:lamajama said:I don't know if he's coming or not but hold out until Gillis folds. Apparently he has good reputation for some reason but if you look at his body of work meaning his draft record, his UFA signings etc its not very impressive
like I said before, all the leafs need right now is a good stay at home defenceman.
Andy007 said:nutman said:lamajama said:I don't know if he's coming or not but hold out until Gillis folds. Apparently he has good reputation for some reason but if you look at his body of work meaning his draft record, his UFA signings etc its not very impressive
like I said before, all the leafs need right now is a good stay at home defenceman.
And Ryan Miller, right?
RedLeaf said:BlueWhiteBlood said:Corn Flake said:Luongo for Connolly and Liles.
Nucks get a centre and some defensive mobility, we send them a long-ish contract we probably don't need going forward, which helps offset the Luongo contract.
That's about the only deal I'd consider for Luongo and even at that, I would still regret the 10 years on his deal and dry heave every time I look at the cap.
And then who else goes? Reimer or Scrivens?
First of all, I like that trade proposal. Secondly, Reimer would be the one that stays hands down. With Luo getting something like a 65/35 split in games, Reimer will learn from one of the best and be ready to take over full time should Luo start to wear down in few years. Of course there's still that horrible contract to deal with, but it could end up being just what the Leafs need to make a better than expected playoff run, and a chance to keep improving for the foreseeable future.
Deebo said:http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2013/1/9/3854426/luongo-and-the-new-cbas-luongo-rule
Here's a piece that shows how early retirement would effect Vancouver and any team that acquires him and what would happen if he was subsequently traded.
Deebo said:http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2013/1/9/3854426/luongo-and-the-new-cbas-luongo-rule
Here's a piece that shows how early retirement would effect Vancouver and any team that acquires him and what would happen if he was subsequently traded.
leafplasma said:Deebo said:http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2013/1/9/3854426/luongo-and-the-new-cbas-luongo-rule
Here's a piece that shows how early retirement would effect Vancouver and any team that acquires him and what would happen if he was subsequently traded.
Deebo that is one heck of a breakdown by that blogger. It makes you wonder who actually does these sort of financial breakdowns in the real deal front offices. It certainly puts the onus on the team that signs the ridiculous contract to begin with and the team that acquires him kind of takes some of that responsibility as the contract ages. Burke was smart in not succumbing to these cap circumventing contracts, when many of us at the times were angry that he didn't. It is like he knew what was coming.
cw said:James Mirtle @mirtle 2m
Nonis also said today that if the Leafs had a really good, experienced third goalie "then we wouldn?t be in the market at all."
Maybe an AHL level deal for depth?
Peter D. said:cw said:James Mirtle @mirtle 2m
Nonis also said today that if the Leafs had a really good, experienced third goalie "then we wouldn?t be in the market at all."
Maybe an AHL level deal for depth?
This sounds like a Scott Clemmensen type.