• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Kypreos: PK Subban traded to Nashville for Shea Weber

herman said:
Not quite sure where to put this, but it sounds like culture change to me.

twitter.com/EricEngels/status/753287522827038720
Was just informed by a source that the Montreal Canadiens let go of analytics specialist Matt Pfeffer.
? Eric Engels (@EricEngels) July 13, 2016
Argued a little too vehemently against a big move the team recently made maybe?
 
herman said:
Not quite sure where to put this, but it sounds like culture change to me.

twitter.com/EricEngels/status/753287522827038720
Was just informed by a source that the Montreal Canadiens let go of analytics specialist Matt Pfeffer.
? Eric Engels (@EricEngels) July 13, 2016

LOL HABS!
 
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/still-questions-answers-p-k-subban-trade/

The analytics don?t support the idea that Weber, who turns 31 on Aug. 14, can have the same influence on the game as 27-year-old Subban can.

A source told Sportsnet that Matt Pfeffer, who was hired as an analytics consultant at the beginning of the 2015-16 season, made an impassioned and elaborate presentation to management to dissuade them from following through on this trade.

Ignoring Pfeffer?s advice only served to reinforce the notion that Bergevin was following different criteria in his evaluation of both players, said the source, who also suggested Pfeffer?s vehemence on the matter might have ultimately cost him the job (he was told on Wednesday that his contract won?t be renewed). The Canadiens would not comment on why they aren?t renewing his contract, but they did say that they are looking into other analytics solutions.

Quick, someone make up some fancy stats that say Weber > Subban and Bergevin will probably give you a hockey ops job!

Also, I can't imagine how soul-crushing that would have been for Pfeffer. Not even to just get fired, but to pour your heart into trying to make a (completely reasonable) case for why trading Subban for Weber is absurd and having absolutely nobody listen to you.
 
http://www.habseyesontheprize.com/latest-news/2015/10/10/9492733/matt-pfeffer-elaborates-on-his-role-with-the-canadiens-habs-analytics-therrien-data-analyst

I don't think the Habs management team was really set up to be receptive to Pfeffer's work. The coaching staff only ever wanted executive summaries, and his lone voice wasn't cutting through the din of traditional intangibles.

I can see him getting picked up to join the Leafs' analytics squad, or Arizona.

It also really emphasizes the importance of having analytics buy-in at the executive level, where you have someone who can translate the stats and data conclusions into actionables at the executive and tactical level.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/still-questions-answers-p-k-subban-trade/

The analytics don?t support the idea that Weber, who turns 31 on Aug. 14, can have the same influence on the game as 27-year-old Subban can.

A source told Sportsnet that Matt Pfeffer, who was hired as an analytics consultant at the beginning of the 2015-16 season, made an impassioned and elaborate presentation to management to dissuade them from following through on this trade.

Ignoring Pfeffer?s advice only served to reinforce the notion that Bergevin was following different criteria in his evaluation of both players, said the source, who also suggested Pfeffer?s vehemence on the matter might have ultimately cost him the job (he was told on Wednesday that his contract won?t be renewed). The Canadiens would not comment on why they aren?t renewing his contract, but they did say that they are looking into other analytics solutions.

Quick, someone make up some fancy stats that say Weber > Subban and Bergevin will probably give you a hockey ops job!

Also, I can't imagine how soul-crushing that would have been for Pfeffer. Not even to just get fired, but to pour your heart into trying to make a (completely reasonable) case for why trading Subban for Weber is absurd and having absolutely nobody listen to you.

I'd apply, but then I'd have to work for Bergevin and the Habs.  So I'll pass and keep selling Fords.  :)
 
herman said:
 
It also really emphasizes the importance of having analytics buy-in at the executive level, where you have someone who can translate the stats and data conclusions into actionables at the executive and tactical level.

I really think the only way that works is with a very clear hierarchical structure though. If you look at the franchises in sports who have really embraced analytics that way like the A's or Rockets it's because they have an executive at the top that has shaped the entire organization to their philosophy. Otherwise, analytics seem designed to just be an opinion among many.

Even a franchise that's invested heavily in analytics opens themselves up to disagreements within the analytics department. I'm sure Pfeffer made a compelling case, and I agree with him about the trade, but let's not pretend he was selling hard facts here.
 
I'm sure the Habs used Pfeffer in ways that helped improve their club, but I'm not exactly surprised that they decided to stick with the "hockey minds" when it came to making a decision of this magnitude. Especially if some of their reasons for trading him weren't exactly entirely hockey/on-ice related.

I mean, I wouldn't have been too surprised if the Leafs stat guys disagreed with how Shanahan viewed Kessel.
 
Nik the Trik said:
herman said:
 
It also really emphasizes the importance of having analytics buy-in at the executive level, where you have someone who can translate the stats and data conclusions into actionables at the executive and tactical level.

I really think the only way that works is with a very clear hierarchical structure though. If you look at the franchises in sports who have really embraced analytics that way like the A's or Rockets it's because they have an executive at the top that has shaped the entire organization to their philosophy. Otherwise, analytics seem designed to just be an opinion among many.

Even a franchise that's invested heavily in analytics opens themselves up to disagreements within the analytics department. I'm sure Pfeffer made a compelling case, and I agree with him about the trade, but let's not pretend he was selling hard facts here.

I super agree with this.

The teams that seem to struggle with analytics (Edm, Col, Mtl, old Leafs) appeared to have misconceptions about what advanced analytics actually means; often they just hire one guy or one outfit and think the problem is largely solved/ignored.

In Pfeffer's case, it was, as CtB said, already decided due to off-ice stuff.
 
herman said:
I super agree with this.

The teams that seem to struggle with analytics (Edm, Col, Mtl, old Leafs) appeared to have misconceptions about what advanced analytics actually means; often they just hire one guy or one outfit and think the problem is largely solved/ignored.

In Pfeffer's case, it was, as CtB said, already decided due to off-ice stuff.

There's no doubt that there are almost certainly going to be teams that will hire an analytics guy just to say they did and so they don't look behind the times but without actually paying much attention to what's said.

But that being said, I don't think anyone's quite cracked the implementation of analytics yet. I certainly don't know if it's the sort of thing that hiring more people helps. Creating a pool of data is helpful, I guess, but it doesn't strike me as something that provides exponential benefits the deeper it is.
 
Nik the Trik said:
There's no doubt that there are almost certainly going to be teams that will hire an analytics guy just to say they did and so they don't look behind the times but without actually paying much attention to what's said.

But that being said, I don't think anyone's quite cracked the implementation of analytics yet. I certainly don't know if it's the sort of thing that hiring more people helps. Creating a pool of data is helpful, I guess, but it doesn't strike me as something that provides exponential benefits the deeper it is.

This level of analytics is still nascent for the NHL, so teams covet the advantageous knowledge as proprietary, and have locked up a lot of the pioneers to incubate and protect their work. Eventually, I hope to see it open back up again when all teams are on equal footing the way they are with box stats.

I don't think one person can cut it for an NHL team; there are just too many things to track and digest. I also don't think hiring a boatload of people would help either as that just muddies the water. I like what Dubas has done with a small, agile group, backed by a data crunching company that can pivot the data quickly for them to draw/test conclusions from.

Their work still needs to translate to the coaching level and what to instruct players to do though: puck carries vs dump & chase, forcing horizontal goaltender movement, etc. I see little evidence of known analytics being employed in Montreal's past couple of seasons on the ice.
 
About the implementation part, all I can say is that Dubas turned the SOO around pretty quickly.  He took a gutted/rebuilding 'play the kids' Marlies team and turned them into the third best regular season AHL team is history, pretty quickly.
 
TBLeafer said:
About the implementation part, all I can say is that Dubas turned the SOO around pretty quickly.  He took a gutted/rebuilding 'play the kids' Marlies team and turned them into the third best regular season AHL team is history, pretty quickly.

Dubas has the ability to sell his analytics-driven ideas to those that don't necessarily grasp the numbers. He doesn't dumb it down, but explains it in a way that enlightens and makes sense. #GMDubas2018
 
herman said:
TBLeafer said:
About the implementation part, all I can say is that Dubas turned the SOO around pretty quickly.  He took a gutted/rebuilding 'play the kids' Marlies team and turned them into the third best regular season AHL team is history, pretty quickly.

Dubas has the ability to sell his analytics-driven ideas to those that don't necessarily grasp the numbers. He doesn't dumb it down, but explains it in a way that enlightens and makes sense. #GMDubas2018

Shout it brother!
 
herman said:
Dubas has the ability to sell his analytics-driven ideas to those that don't necessarily grasp the numbers. He doesn't dumb it down, but explains it in a way that enlightens and makes sense. #GMDubas2018

#GMDubasAugust2016
 
Nik the Trik said:
herman said:
Dubas has the ability to sell his analytics-driven ideas to those that don't necessarily grasp the numbers. He doesn't dumb it down, but explains it in a way that enlightens and makes sense. #GMDubas2018

#GMDubasAugust2016

What if Lou called himself into his own office...
 
It took Subban less than a day to become beloved in Nashville:

[tweet]754774411605975040[/tweet]

www.twitter.com/TomAWillis/status/754774411605975040
 
The leafs are at least two years away from rally talking playoff impact most likely.  I hope Nashville wins back to back.
 
L K said:
The leafs are at least two years away from rally talking playoff impact most likely.  I hope Nashville wins back to back.

Yeah I think that Nik brought this up already but a lot of people will probably be jumping on the Nashville bandwagon (myself included). That city and Subban do seem like a match made in heaven.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
L K said:
The leafs are at least two years away from rally talking playoff impact most likely.  I hope Nashville wins back to back.

Yeah I think that Nik brought this up already but a lot of people will probably be jumping on the Nashville bandwagon (myself included). That city and Subban do seem like a match made in heaven.

It's weird that a team would have problems with Subban, and by team I mean players on that team.  One story in Montreal is that there was a team party, and Subban was not invited to it.  Also, when he showed up, he was asked to leave.  He comes across as a likeable guy though, so I can't see how a team would want to ostracise him that much.  Reminds me of the rumours surrounding Dion Phaneuf back when he was with the Flames.
 
With businesses with dozens of employees working together in close proximity, sometimes you have personality conflicts that just don't seem to dissipate much over time...you hope they learn to get along, and most of the time they learn to.

Sometimes though you have to make a decision on someone for the better of the business moving forward simply because the circumstances can become a distraction that affects overall productivity.  Those are tough decisions, especially when that someone is an otherwise productive member of the team. 

I don't know if the Subban thing was or wasn't a issue like this, but I have a hard time thinking that they wanted to run a fan favourite, a local philanthropist, and a damn good hockey player out of town because the habs are a bunch of bigots.

Maybe he's a jerk, maybe not.  Maybe there are a bunch of jerks on that team, or running that team, and maybe not.  I don't care for the habs, and I'm not sure if they got better or worse with this transaction, but I still hope that Shea Weber doesn't get hammered in Montreal just because he was traded for Subban. 
 
Back
Top