WhatIfGodWasALeaf
Active member
herman said:
Any word on supplemental discipline for this?
I assume it's filed in the same drawer as Ovechkin's hit on Komarov last year at the NHL head office, titled "Star Player Exemption".
Stars @ Leafs - Nov. 2nd, 7:30pm - SNO, Fan 590
- Thread starter CarltonTheBear
- Start date
Any word on supplemental discipline for this?
I assume it's filed in the same drawer as Ovechkin's hit on Komarov last year at the NHL head office, titled "Star Player Exemption".
bustaheims
Active member
Patrick said:
Honestly, I'd be surprised if any player received supplemental discipline for that. It should have been a penalty in-game, but it wasn't a forceful enough act to warrant anything more than that. Similar plays by a wide range of players go undisciplined all season long.
bustaheims said:
It should be an automatic 1-game suspension. Probably the dirtiest thing a player can do. But yeah, the NHL has been turning a blind eye to that stuff for a long time now so I doubt they start with the reigning Art Ross champ.
GhostofPotvin29
New member
Something I was wondering - is there a set of guidelines/rules for the coaches challenge? Like say for instance the disallowed goal for offside last night. Hypothetically, had Boyes not scored it and it went back the other way and Dallas scored - could the Leafs have challenged that the initial rush should have been offside?
bustaheims
Active member
Potvin29 said:
There are guidelines, yeah. I don't what they are in every situation, but in this specific one, had the puck exited the zone, it would no longer have been reviewable. So, no, in your hypothetical situation, the Leafs would not have been able to challenge.
Potvin29 said:
I'm going to guess no. For the offside rule the play has to have remained in Dallas' end for them to be able to challenge the call. So once the puck left their zone the opportunity to challenge would be over, meaning the Leafs wouldn't have been able to use it on a goal against them.
L K
Active member
CarltonTheBear said:
Yep. It doesn't matter how long after the initial offside. If a team had a 5-minute possession and ended up scoring, the goal could be reversed and the game goes back 5-minutes in play. Once the puck leaves the zone, the offside play is invalidated and is not reviewable.
B
brothert
Guest
So what happens if the puck doesn't leave the zone and Clune was on the ice and gets a match penalty for some ridiculous hit to the head from behind. Can we say it never happened because the play was offside? ;D
Or lets tone it down a bit and say a leaf gets a tripping penalty during this timeframe.
Or lets tone it down a bit and say a leaf gets a tripping penalty during this timeframe.
hockeyfan1
New member
A much better game, a much better effort. Yes, Reimer, but it was an overall team effort that produced results. The stats weren't too shoddy either, as the Stars incurred 10 PIM compared to the Leafs 4; faceoffs won 43-39 in favour of the Leafs; blocked shots in favour of the Leafs (16 to 7), etc.
Source: NHL.com
Source: NHL.com
Highlander
Active member
agreed with Hockfan, they put out the effort last night and Reimer looked like he was tracking the pucks well, which is part of the new training system, perhaps its starting to sink in.
WhatIfGodWasALeaf
Active member
hockeyfan1 said:
Surface level fluff, score aside they had a pretty abysmal outing, how much of it was score effects, I'm not sure.
hockeyfan1
New member
Patrick said:
Yeah, well, they still won the game abysmal level or no abysmal level. I wouldn't expect to see these results on a consistent basis, but I'll take the and revel it's glory. Afterall, don't expect a 'feel good' result too often this season for we all know how bad this team already is.
They won and that's it. Enjoy it!
WhatIfGodWasALeaf
Active member
hockeyfan1 said:
I'm not disputing any of that and I did enjoy it, I'm disputing the recap of the game you posted that doesn't come close to telling the story of the game.
GhostofPotvin29
New member
CarltonTheBear said:
I figured, but it just made me think because if it stayed in the end and Toronto scored as LK said, 5-minutes later - at what point has enough time passed that you can't go back on the offside that was missed? I was just thinking if it's offside and called then it doesn't go back the other way in the same manner and if there was no restrictions on it, where is the line. WHERRRRRE!!