• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Unofficial 2013-2014 Armchair GM Thread

Nik the Trik said:
Tigger said:
Yeah, probably, especially since the lottery went the way it did. There might be a way to sweeten the pot but I don't know. I mean, the Islanders could have chosen to keep this years pick and I don't think the next one was protected ( it's not how it went down, still ).

I'm not sure about Tallon and ownership there though, they might be looking to make a splash.

Honestly, as much as I like and respect Kessel...I think teams with a 1st overall pick are aiming higher.

I dunno, that seems more optics to me given the quality of this years draft.
 
Tigger said:
Nik the Trik said:
Tigger said:
Yeah, probably, especially since the lottery went the way it did. There might be a way to sweeten the pot but I don't know. I mean, the Islanders could have chosen to keep this years pick and I don't think the next one was protected ( it's not how it went down, still ).

I'm not sure about Tallon and ownership there though, they might be looking to make a splash.

Honestly, as much as I like and respect Kessel...I think teams with a 1st overall pick are aiming higher.

I dunno, that seems more optics to me given the quality of this years draft.

Yeah. Plus, aiming high and getting someone better than Kessel are two completely different things altogether.  How many GMs would choose an essentially unproven player over one of the best goal scorers in the NHL today? In this years draft? My guess...none.
 
Tigger said:
I dunno, that seems more optics to me given the quality of this years draft.

I think pre-draft evaluations of the overall strength of the draft are largely immaterial to what I'm saying though. Even in years without clear-cut, hands-down #1 picks like '04 or '05 or where the overall crop is seen as not having a lot of depth, players that are better than or comparable to Kessel are available essentially every year and usually in the top 10 or 15 picks. There's no way to be sure who that player is, sure, but even in bad drafts the players at the top of the draft have a ton of potential.

So even in a draft where the #1 pick has, say, a 20% chance of being that sort of player as opposed to a Crosby who probably had a 99% chance the teams with a #1 pick are still probably going to favour rolling the dice otherwise they're basically just importing Toronto's larger problem of not having guys like Toews or Tavares while at the same time being too good to be in a position to draft them.

If you look at the last 10-15 years of the draft it's pretty unavoidable that whoever is picking #1 at the very least has the opportunity to pick someone with the potential to be a Kessel but who would be 8 years younger and have 7 more years of team control. I could maybe see someone trading that if they were either desperate to win right away, already had the major building blocks in place and/or money was no object to them but I don't think any of those applies to Florida.
 
Tallon has an owner that has given him the go ahead to spend now and I'd guess he's also a little desperate to win, so there's that. Also, getting Kessel would eliminate any guess work, he'll be a bonafide top 10 scorer at a position his team really needs.

I'd agree Tallon seems too savvy for that, and he's also said he's looking at adding heavily through free agency but I don't think something like that is out of the question on his end, in fact I'd say it's the Leafs management that are probably the biggest stumbling block.
 
Tigger said:
Tallon has an owner that has given him the go ahead to spend now and I'd guess he's also a little desperate to win, so there's that.

There's "spending" and there's making decisions without regard to money. While I'm sure a new owner is making all the right noises about the money the Panthers might spend, they're never going to be a team where the cap is holding them back.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Tigger said:
Tallon has an owner that has given him the go ahead to spend now and I'd guess he's also a little desperate to win, so there's that.

There's "spending" and there's making decisions without regard to money. While I'm sure a new owner is making all the right noises about the money the Panthers might spend, they're never going to be a team where the cap is holding them back.

If this owner has any brains, he will take a look at what Buffalo did when the new guy gave them all that money and they basically screwed themselves up in one summer.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Tigger said:
Tallon has an owner that has given him the go ahead to spend now and I'd guess he's also a little desperate to win, so there's that.

There's "spending" and there's making decisions without regard to money. While I'm sure a new owner is making all the right noises about the money the Panthers might spend, they're never going to be a team where the cap is holding them back.

And the Luongo thing, while a decent chunk of money, comes with very little long-term risk from the retirement standpoint and Luongo is really loved in Florida so it had a lot of good will with the small fanbase.  Just taking on money for the sake of taking on money still seems out of sorts with Florida.
 
L K said:
And the Luongo thing, while a decent chunk of money, comes with very little long-term risk from the retirement standpoint and Luongo is really loved in Florida so it had a lot of good will with the small fanbase.  Just taking on money for the sake of taking on money still seems out of sorts with Florida.

I mean, because Vancouver's retaining money, they took on an 8 year deal with 36.26 million on it left in terms of cap dollars but only 27.5 million in terms of actual dollars. That's not a big spending move anyway you look at it.
 
OldTimeHockey said:
Nik the Trik said:
That's not a big spending move anyway you look at it.

It is compared to the $400 I'm so upset about spending on a lawnmower. Hopefully I get 8 years outta this one.

Apples to Oranges. Roberto Luongo would want at least $500 to mow your lawn.
 
OldTimeHockey said:
Nik the Trik said:
That's not a big spending move anyway you look at it.

It is compared to the $400 I'm so upset about spending on a lawnmower. Hopefully I get 8 years outta this one.

Did you say 8 years because that's the term left on Luongo's contract or because that's how long your last mower lasted.  If it's the latter, man alive, you must have been pretty hard on that poor machine.
 
From THN ( Fantasy Hockey):

Looking to add ? The Leafs need size up the middle and more physicality on defense. Many Leafs fans (or non-fans, for that matter) will opine that the team also needs a No. 1 center, but really ? most teams need that. If Toronto were to target Brian Boyle to replace McClement, they would have a 6-foot-7 centerman coming off a Stanley Cup final appearance.
Nothing against McClement, who has been great, but with Boyle having similar success at the faceoff dot (52.9 percent) the upgrade in size would be worthwhile. Boyle only offers fantasy value in hits and faceoff wins, but unless Toronto makes a trade, you probably won?t see an impact fantasy
player coming aboard.

Brooks Orpik is another player who could be targeted, as he offers bone-crushing hits and a ?scare factor? on the blueline that the team currently lacks.

Granted, the Leafs could (and should) take a good hard look
at skilled pivot Paul Stastny. A move like that would drop Tyler Bozak to the third line where he would offer tremendous two-way play and 40-point offense. But most
teams will be targeting Stastny, who is the top center available. The cost will
probably shock us. Would Toronto pay it? Adding Stastny would either
necessitate trading Nazem Kadri, or it would keep Peter Holland out of the
NHL (which would be a shame).


 
hockeyfan1 said:
From THN ( Fantasy Hockey):

Looking to add ? The Leafs need size up the middle and more physicality on defense. Many Leafs fans (or non-fans, for that matter) will opine that the team also needs a No. 1 center, but really ? most teams need that. If Toronto were to target Brian Boyle to replace McClement, they would have a 6-foot-7 centerman coming off a Stanley Cup final appearance.
Nothing against McClement, who has been great, but with Boyle having similar success at the faceoff dot (52.9 percent) the upgrade in size would be worthwhile. Boyle only offers fantasy value in hits and faceoff wins, but unless Toronto makes a trade, you probably won?t see an impact fantasy
player coming aboard.

Brooks Orpik is another player who could be targeted, as he offers bone-crushing hits and a ?scare factor? on the blueline that the team currently lacks.

Granted, the Leafs could (and should) take a good hard look
at skilled pivot Paul Stastny. A move like that would drop Tyler Bozak to the third line where he would offer tremendous two-way play and 40-point offense. But most
teams will be targeting Stastny, who is the top center available. The cost will
probably shock us. Would Toronto pay it? Adding Stastny would either
necessitate trading Nazem Kadri, or it would keep Peter Holland out of the
NHL (which would be a shame).

Lost a little bit of credibility when he said McClement had been "great".
 
John Shannon-
Hearing the names Craig Ramsay and Rick Tocchet as possible assistant coaches in Toronto with the Maple Leafs.
 
Back
Top