[tweet]570683708187004929[/tweet]
[tweet]570684849092231168[/tweet]
[tweet]570684849092231168[/tweet]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Potvin29 said:Pretty much as good a return as possible for Winnik. Sill is a nothing throw-in, probably for cap/contract limit reasons or something.
slapshot said:I would like to have seen Winnick packaged with something else to bring more.
Bullfrog said:Count me surprised. I was optimistic he'd get a 2nd rounder, but a 4th as well is a good return.
bustaheims said:reporterchris: My mistake: The #leafs retained 50% of Daniel Winnik's contract.
I find that a little surprising, as it means the Leafs currently are doing so on the maximum 3 contracts, but, since tow of them expire this season, I suppose it's not a significant issue. Just means, if anyone with term is moved before the draft, it will be at full price.
bustaheims said:reporterchris: My mistake: The #leafs retained 50% of Daniel Winnik's contract.
I find that a little surprising, as it means the Leafs currently are doing so on the maximum 3 contracts, but, since tow of them expire this season, I suppose it's not a significant issue. Just means, if anyone with term is moved before the draft, it will be at full price.
bustaheims said:reporterchris: My mistake: The #leafs retained 50% of Daniel Winnik's contract.
I find that a little surprising, as it means the Leafs currently are doing so on the maximum 3 contracts, but, since tow of them expire this season, I suppose it's not a significant issue. Just means, if anyone with term is moved before the draft, it will be at full price.
Deebo said:Winnik, Gunnarsson and?
bustaheims said:Deebo said:Winnik, Gunnarsson and?
Franson.