• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2017-2018 Toronto Raptors Thread: "O.G...Change Is In the Air!"

CarltonTheBear said:
Oh, it all makes sense now. @stevesimmons is Mark Hunter's burner account.

I wouldn't be surprised if Simmons had "burner" accounts of his own, except for the fact he's probably not techie at all and wouldn't even know how to set one up.
 
Zee said:
CarltonTheBear said:
Oh, it all makes sense now. @stevesimmons is Mark Hunter's burner account.

I wouldn't be surprised if Simmons had "burner" accounts of his own, except for the fact he's probably not techie at all and wouldn't even know how to set one up.

Nah, someone like Simmons is just fine saying the dumb things he says on his regular account.

But I don't doubt for a second that a good number of NHL GMs probably have burner accounts, they're likely only using them to observe and not to trash their own players though.
 
The Lebron James sweepstakes begin:  The quest for Lebron & the Raptors...

Much speculation has been made about the fact that Lebron James will become a free agent come July 1st of this year.  As of right now, James' Cavaliers will be battling Curry's Warriors in the NBA Final.

Will they or won't they?  The Raptors, that is.  Such as in luring James north of the border.A far-fetched improbable undertaking?  Not quite.  The Raptors need to shed salary (Ibaka, Powell, etc.) in order to even consider such a signing in the first place.

Besides all of that, would LeBron choose to play here?

Read all about the how and the why:
https://raptorsrapture.com/2018/05/31/the-official-pitch-for-lebron-james-to-join-the-toronto-raptors/
 
https://twitter.com/ChrisMannixYS/status/1004754604536598528

For as long as man has walked upon this earth, he has blamed a woman for his own mistakes.  ::)
 
herman said:
For as long as man has walked upon this earth, he has blamed a woman for his own mistakes.  ::)

I'm ok with her getting thrown under a bus a little. There is legit evidence that suggests it was her and not Bryan, isn't there?

What I do think is a little crappy is Bryan taking over that bus, reversing it over her, and then driving forward again:

DfGl-dFW4AAUQ70.jpg
 
CarltonTheBear said:
herman said:
For as long as man has walked upon this earth, he has blamed a woman for his own mistakes.  ::)

I'm ok with her getting thrown under a bus a little. There is legit evidence that suggests it was her and not Bryan, isn't there?

What I do think is a little crappy is Bryan taking over that bus, reversing it over her, and then driving forward again:

DfGl-dFW4AAUQ70.jpg
Yeah, I'm with you Carlton on this one. Nothing else matters in the grand scheme of things then what happens at home with your family. This press release is awful and cringe worthy. I can't imagine the thought process behind this, family first. Take one for the team. Not a big fan of this guy.
 
CarltonTheBear said:
I'm ok with her getting thrown under a bus a little. There is legit evidence that suggests it was her and not Bryan, isn't there?

The evidence was those accounts listed what appeared to be her phone number as the recovery number. And obviously these 'interviews' with lawyers.

Of course, after Colangelo was directly asked about 2 of the 5 accounts, the unmentioned 3 went dark immediately.

So either

a) Barbara was running the accounts and was tipped off by whoever first fielded the call from the Sixer's staff (i.e. they knew of its existence)

b) Barbara was running the accounts, and after going through a couple, Bryan noticed they revealed information that he had shared with her in confidence/frustration and raised the concern to her immediately

c) Bryan was running the accounts through Barbara all along and in an effort to salvage his job and reputation, used his patsy.
 
herman said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I'm ok with her getting thrown under a bus a little. There is legit evidence that suggests it was her and not Bryan, isn't there?

The evidence was those accounts listed what appeared to be her phone number as the recovery number. And obviously these 'interviews' with lawyers.

Of course, after Colangelo was directly asked about 2 of the 5 accounts, the unmentioned 3 went dark immediately.

So either

a) Barbara was running the accounts and was tipped off by whoever first fielded the call from the Sixer's staff (i.e. they knew of its existence)

b) Barbara was running the accounts, and after going through a couple, Bryan noticed they revealed information that he had shared with her in confidence/frustration and raised the concern to her immediately

c) Bryan was running the accounts through Barbara all along and in an effort to salvage his job and reputation, used his patsy.

No doubt the final answer.
 
herman said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I'm ok with her getting thrown under a bus a little. There is legit evidence that suggests it was her and not Bryan, isn't there?

The evidence was those accounts listed what appeared to be her phone number as the recovery number. And obviously these 'interviews' with lawyers.

Of course, after Colangelo was directly asked about 2 of the 5 accounts, the unmentioned 3 went dark immediately.

So either

a) Barbara was running the accounts and was tipped off by whoever first fielded the call from the Sixer's staff (i.e. they knew of its existence)

b) Barbara was running the accounts, and after going through a couple, Bryan noticed they revealed information that he had shared with her in confidence/frustration and raised the concern to her immediately

c) Bryan was running the accounts through Barbara all along and in an effort to salvage his job and reputation, used his patsy.

If it was c), and an interview was part of the evidence, wouldn't that suggest that Barbara was okay with being being the patsy?
 
hockeyfan1 said:
herman said:
CarltonTheBear said:
I'm ok with her getting thrown under a bus a little. There is legit evidence that suggests it was her and not Bryan, isn't there?

The evidence was those accounts listed what appeared to be her phone number as the recovery number. And obviously these 'interviews' with lawyers.

Of course, after Colangelo was directly asked about 2 of the 5 accounts, the unmentioned 3 went dark immediately.

So either

a) Barbara was running the accounts and was tipped off by whoever first fielded the call from the Sixer's staff (i.e. they knew of its existence)

b) Barbara was running the accounts, and after going through a couple, Bryan noticed they revealed information that he had shared with her in confidence/frustration and raised the concern to her immediately

c) Bryan was running the accounts through Barbara all along and in an effort to salvage his job and reputation, used his patsy.

No doubt the final answer.

Why "no doubt"?
 
Deebo said:
If it was c), and an interview was part of the evidence, wouldn't that suggest that Barbara was okay with being being the patsy?

And, to that point, if your spouse did something that might seriously jeopardize their future career but you could take the hit at no real personal cost isn't it a pretty natural instinct to want to do that?
 
Thanks for the information, very helpful. I will share with you a link to the guys https://paperleaf.ca/toronto/ who help write a great resume. Honestly, it's a godsend!
 
Back
Top