Nik Bethune said:
That said, there's a degree of that plaguing all sports. Part of what hockey's facing right now, what's unique to the way the game has changed, is that by eliminating enforcers and grinders and de-emphasizing the value of defensive forwards what we're left with is a game where anywhere from a third to forty percent of the game is played by players who are just less good versions of 1st and 2nd line players.
But in part that's because the rules were changed to make it harder for those defensive forwards to affect the outcome of the game, and by making the enforcer role more detrimental to a team's likely success.
The defensive forwards were somewhat phased out once they changed the way things like hooking, holding, slashing, etc were called, which was a direct attempt to stop the clutch and grab era which was even worse to watch than the current iteration.
The change on the enforcer side came partly from rules changes to eliminate things like bench-clearing brawls and the staged fights and partly the natural evolution once you eliminated the clutch and grab stuff...those 4th liners actually had to be able to play hockey instead of being Neanderthals with the ability to tie skate laces.
The current game IMO) is better than the clutch & grab era, but I do yearn for more of a game like the ones during the height of the Oilers dynasty. We saw a bit of that in the World Cup a few years ago when the NA Kids team was insanely entertaining to watch thanks to McLellan just letting the kids play however the hell they wanted, then sticking McJesus between Matthews and Scheifele. Those were probably the most entertaining games I can remember since Gretz and Mario were on the same line in the Canada Cup many, many moons ago.
Trouble is, the NHL's goal is to maximize revenue and profit, not maximize entertainment, and those aren't necessarily the same brand of hockey.