Highlander
Active member
It's the law in Arizona, that misdemeanours can be worked out between the plaintiff and accused. So settlements happen all the time there. As Bullfrog points out it clears already full dockets in the courts and of course save's the taxpayers a lot of money. And not every plaintiff is looking for a cash payout, some are just looking for a heartfelt apology.AvroArrow said:Bullfrog said:Disingenuous on Matthews's part? It's the point of the justice system to ensure restitution for victims and to punish the guilty (where necessary). If she was happy with the settlement, then justice is done. It doesn't send a good message to bring this through the courts and cost the taxpayers thousands of dollars.
I think the issue is with someone being able to buy their way out of trouble, a luxury that not everyone can afford.
One has to ask if the charge would have been laid if she didn't know Matthews has a fortune? Seems like a Juvenile prank that just enriched the plaintiff by "probably" quite a substantial amount. Matthews is still a very young man (My son is 26 going on 12) and he seems to be highly intelligent. I would think he has learned a lesson.