Kin
Active member
princedpw said:I don't see this as a loss for Lombardi.
I don't think that anyone looks at this deal as a bad one for the Kings or one that Lombardi's stupid to sign. The public perception though, rightly or wrongly, isn't going to be great when you very publicly say you won't pay a guy a certain amount and then you do.
princedpw said:We'll never know, but ignoring the possibility of injury, I'll bet Doughty would have wound up with more cash if he had taken a 4-year $5-6million/year deal.
I don't think it's all that significant, particularly if Doughty gets a big chunk of money frontloaded in this deal.
Let's say, under your scenario, Doughty signed a 4 year, 24 million dollar deal and then, at 25, signed a 10 year/80 million dollar deal. That takes him to 35 and has him earning 104 million over 14 years. Let's say, though, that Doughty has this deal and then, at 28, signs a 6 year deal, 48 million dollar deal. That would see him earn....104 million over 14 years. But, because Doughty would get more money up front here he'd come out ahead.
Even if the market for Doughty as a free agent is ten million per than under the first scenario he'd make 124 million and under the second he'd make 116 million. Again, though, if this deal is front loaded Doughty would basically end up making the same. The free agent market for Doughty would have to be significantly more than ten million dollars a year for there to be a significant difference money wise.