• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

Women's Hockey

Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Things really haven't improved in terms of real competition ... again.  USA outshoots Sweden 70-9.

Sorry to say it, but they really need to take another hard look at whether to suspend women's hockey from the Olympics until and unless the rest of world produces a least a couple of more real teams.

yep, it's a virtual yawnfest until the Canada/USA game?..
 
Potvin29 said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Things really haven't improved in terms of real competition ... again.  USA outshoots Sweden 70-9.

Sorry to say it, but they really need to take another hard look at whether to suspend women's hockey from the Olympics until and unless the rest of world produces a least a couple of more real teams.

Should they take out every sport where 1 or 2 counties dominate?  Because women's hockey isn't the only one where a couple countries get virtually all of the gold and silver medals.

Yes.

Having said that, like what?  Even in this year's Holland blowout in speedskating there's no comparison.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Things really haven't improved in terms of real competition ... again.  USA outshoots Sweden 70-9.

Sorry to say it, but they really need to take another hard look at whether to suspend women's hockey from the Olympics until and unless the rest of world produces a least a couple of more real teams.

I'd agree if it weren't for the fact that there seems to be absolutely no criteria whatsoever for a sport being in the Winter Olympics. It seems like any humanly possible method of someone on top of a snowy hill getting to the bottom is deemed a discipline worthy of Olympic celebration.

Are you trying to dash my dreams of getting Freestyle Face Planting included?  >:(
 
drummond said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Things really haven't improved in terms of real competition ... again.  USA outshoots Sweden 70-9.

Sorry to say it, but they really need to take another hard look at whether to suspend women's hockey from the Olympics until and unless the rest of world produces a least a couple of more real teams.

Give it few more years. You do not have to go anywhere further than to men hockey tournament at Olympics. From 1920 to 1952 the tournament was dominated by Canada. Those teams hammered opposition davastatingly. They outscored opponents 110:3 (1924), 38:0 (1928), 32:4 (1932), 54:7 (1936), 69:5 (1948) and 71:14 (1952). Since early fifties several other teams has emerged, Soviet Union naturally, but also Czekoslovakia and Sweden. Later joined by Finland. But in general you can say it took the world 40 years to match Canada, which is questionable as Canada could not send its best NHL players to the Olympics, while Soviet union was sending their "amateurs". I am pretty much convinced that with Gordie Howe and company Canada would dominate 50?s as well as 60?s pretty easily. Only in 70s and 80?s Soviets became even.

But I see your point.

A better comparison to me is the World Juniors.  Used to be a couple teams and no one else was close.  Canada dominated.  Now there's not really any dominance by one team.

In women's hockey the opposing teams are getting much better, but at the same time Canada-US are getting much better.  They'll plateau and other teams will catch up some more. 
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Yes.

Having said that, like what?  Even in this year's Holland blowout in speedskating there's no comparison.

Well, exactly. I mean, relatively few team events aside, there's at least competition between the Lowlanders in the various speed skating events.

I can't help but feel as though the answer to the hockey problem, if the argument is going to be made that Women's Hockey is vital to the Olympics, is to do what we've always said would be great and open these hockey tournaments up to multiple entrants from individual countries. If your Sweden's and your whoevers can't catch up to Canada's B or C teams, then you have a real problem.
 
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Potvin29 said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Things really haven't improved in terms of real competition ... again.  USA outshoots Sweden 70-9.

Sorry to say it, but they really need to take another hard look at whether to suspend women's hockey from the Olympics until and unless the rest of world produces a least a couple of more real teams.

Should they take out every sport where 1 or 2 counties dominate?  Because women's hockey isn't the only one where a couple countries get virtually all of the gold and silver medals.

Yes.

Having said that, like what?  Even in this year's Holland blowout in speedskating there's no comparison.

Luge was added at the 1964 Olympics and Germany has won 75 of the 129 medals awarded for it, and 31 of the 44 gold medals. In men's and women's singles luge, a German has won 20 out of the 30 combined Olympic golds. This Olympics, Germany won gold in all 4 luge events, the 8th time they have swept it.  I also read that at one point German's womens lugers had won 100 straight World Cup events.

Other sports have dominant countries, and women's hockey hasn't been an Olympic sport all that long.  It's come pretty far in that time, and even this Olympics the games haven't been nearly as lopsided (in general).  Much more competitive from what I've seen.
 
Potvin29 said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Potvin29 said:
Zanzibar Buck-Buck McFate said:
Things really haven't improved in terms of real competition ... again.  USA outshoots Sweden 70-9.

Sorry to say it, but they really need to take another hard look at whether to suspend women's hockey from the Olympics until and unless the rest of world produces a least a couple of more real teams.

Should they take out every sport where 1 or 2 counties dominate?  Because women's hockey isn't the only one where a couple countries get virtually all of the gold and silver medals.

Yes.

Having said that, like what?  Even in this year's Holland blowout in speedskating there's no comparison.

Luge was added at the 1964 Olympics and Germany has won 75 of the 129 medals awarded for it, and 31 of the 44 gold medals. In men's and women's singles luge, a German has won 20 out of the 30 combined Olympic golds. This Olympics, Germany won gold in all 4 luge events, the 8th time they have swept it.  I also read that at one point German's womens lugers had won 100 straight World Cup events.

Other sports have dominant countries, and women's hockey hasn't been an Olympic sport all that long.  It's come pretty far in that time, and even this Olympics the games haven't been nearly as lopsided (in general).  Much more competitive from what I've seen.

What can I say?  No other sport, not even luge, has been so dominated by 2 countries, and with such a big gap between them and everyone else. 

It does sound like the rest of them are more competitive with each other, but put it this way: what would people say if the pools were determined by chance, so that USA and Canada could end up in the same pool and couldn't play against each other in the final?  Until that question doesn't matter, then women's Olympic hockey has a big problem.

In women's hockey the opposing teams are getting much better, but at the same time Canada-US are getting much better.  They'll plateau and other teams will catch up some more. 

That was Botterill's argument the other day.  All I can say is that the gap hasn't closed in the last 4 years, so the day of catch-up sure seems a long way off.
 
Pretty unrealistic for 'the gap' to close in 4 years.  Takes years and years of a developmental program in the countries start to pump out players.  Look how long it took the U.S. to start having a great deal of high-end talent end up in the NHL despite a massive population.  It took southern expansion to really get people playing in other areas and you're starting to see more and more NHLers out of the southern US and it's making the US into a hockey factory.

And despite that, Canada won their preliminary games 5-0, 3-0 and 3-2.  That's not altogether different than, say, the U.S. in the men's preliminary round here.  It's getting there, and I don't know why it becomes the focus of a country or two dominating.  Like I said, luge IS an example of a country dominating a sport, even if you choose not to accept the fact.  If women's hockey had been an Olympic sport since the 60s I guarantee you'd have had different results by now.
 
Potvin29 said:
2badknees said:
3-1 Canada.

No can dunk, but good fundamentals

Swiss have been pretty good in this game, I'm impressed.  Their goalie has been great.

Schelling plays in the Candia Women's Hockey League, for the
Brampton Thunder, whose teammates are Team Canada's
Gillian Apps & Jayna Helford.

Obviously, playing in a league of that caliber (for women), she's faced her fair share of tough shots, which in turn has prabably also helped her become a better goaltender.

With Swiss hockey on the rise especially on the men's part,
the Swiss women can't be far behind.  They've already
progressed somewhat as they will play Team Sweden in the bronze medal game.
 
The USA beat Sweden 6-1 to advanr to the Gold medal matchup against Canada.

Bronze medal game is between Switzerland & Sweden.

Both games are on Thursday.

Source:  CBC Sports
 
Sounds like the debate of women's hockey inclusion has been put to rest:

http://www.tsn.ca/canadian_hockey/story/?id=444091
 
Peter D. said:
Sounds like the debate of women's hockey inclusion has been put to rest:

http://www.tsn.ca/canadian_hockey/story/?id=444091

Not that I think women's hockey is going to get cut for 2018, but I think the IOC is the decider, not the IIHF.
 
This article suggests a few ways in which the Women's game could be improved, least of all the inclusion of more foreign-born players, both at the NCAA level (US) and the CWHL (Canada). 

Also, it's agreed that the women's game could use much more funding.

But, what I always suspected, as mentioned, is the culture of where these hockey women come from -- Eastern/Western European women obviously aren't from the same ilk that North American women are from -- i happen to know that for a fact that many females frown on their gender playing a man's game,.and also the fact that due to attitudes towards the progress of women in many different areas of life (business, sports, etc)., it isn't quite yet at the level we see here in North America.

Well, anyway, judge for yourselves, but regardless, Women's hockey is here to stay.

http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/thn-in-sochi-womens-hockey-still-has-a-long-way-to-go/
 
hockeyfan1 said:
i happen to know that for a fact that many females frown on their gender playing a man's game,.and also the fact that due to attitudes towards the progress of women in many different areas of life (business, sports, etc)., it isn't quite yet at the level we see here in North America.

All the more reason to keep the sport involved in the Olympics.

 
OldTimeHockey said:
hockeyfan1 said:
i happen to know that for a fact that many females frown on their gender playing a man's game,.and also the fact that due to attitudes towards the progress of women in many different areas of life (business, sports, etc)., it isn't quite yet at the level we see here in North America.

All the more reason to keep the sport involved in the Olympics.

Hear hear.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top