• For users coming over from tmlfans.ca your username will remain the same but you will need to use the password reset feature (check your spam folder) on the login page in order to set your password. If you encounter issues, email Rick couchmanrick@gmail.com

2016-17 Centennial Leafs General Team Discussion

herman said:
I wouldn't mind this:
https://twitter.com/ChartingHockey/status/838915583538262016
www.twitter.com/ChartingHockey/status/838915583538262016

Babcock's head would explode when team Gardlander goes 8% on the draw.
 
I was toying with this earlier in the day

The Leafs could actually roll some fun (and at least serviceable) lines along national... lines:

JvR - Matthews - Bracco
Leivo - Kadri - Marner - So, I want this now.
Timashov - Nylander - Johnsson
Leipsic - Brooks - Griffith
Hyman - Bozak - Brown

Less fun or incomplete:
Moore - Boyle - Rychel
Martin - Gauthier - Fehr
Soshnikov - Kalinin - Korshkov/Korostelev
Lindberg - ? - Grundstrom
Komarov - ? - Kapanen
 
Do you have concerns about carrying 50 SPCs the rest of the way limiting our capabilities to land college free agents or juniors ready to graduate into the AHL?

http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2017/3/8/14814708/the-toronto-maple-leafs-have-maxed-the-50-contract-limit
 
herman said:
Do you have concerns about carrying 50 SPCs the rest of the way limiting our capabilities to land college free agents or juniors ready to graduate into the AHL?

http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2017/3/8/14814708/the-toronto-maple-leafs-have-maxed-the-50-contract-limit

Not really. For our own players getting them to sign try-out deals with the Marlies instead of SPCs shouldn't be a problem.

And really given that this years crop of college free agents doesn't seem all that great, it's possible none of them get contracts that start immediately to burn off a year of their ELCs. So we can still sign them to contracts that begin next season and have them also go the try-out route to get them with the Marlies this season.

The player that the article somewhat laments we couldn't sign, Zach MacEwen, didn't sign a contract for the 2016-2017 season. His deal starts next year. So our contract situation wasn't what prevented us from getting him.
 
I'm not usually one to make appeals to authority but you have to figure that prior to the Fehr deal the issue came up and the Leafs weren't too worried about being able to sign someone if they were available.
 
The article laying out the possible options did help assuage my initial contract limit concerns that underlay my hot take rage that we did not trade Polak at the deadline.

KHL/Euro signings might still be a thing to get into, but I think we can manage. 11+1 contracts coming off automatically via UFA + Expansion. 9 RFAs where only maybe 6-7 should be qualified. I think we're onboarding 5-6 juniors.
 
herman said:
The article laying out the possible options did help assuage my initial contract limit concerns that underlay my hot take rage that we did not trade Polak at the deadline.

KHL/Euro signings might still be a thing to get into, but I think we can manage. 11+1 contracts coming off automatically via UFA + Expansion. 9 RFAs where only maybe 6-7 should be qualified. I think we're onboarding 5-6 juniors.

Just curious herman, but who do you think they're not re-signing?
 
Frank E said:
herman said:
The article laying out the possible options did help assuage my initial contract limit concerns that underlay my hot take rage that we did not trade Polak at the deadline.

KHL/Euro signings might still be a thing to get into, but I think we can manage. 11+1 contracts coming off automatically via UFA + Expansion. 9 RFAs where only maybe 6-7 should be qualified. I think we're onboarding 5-6 juniors.

Just curious herman, but who do you think they're not re-signing?

Of the RFAs, easy ones to not qualify would be Sergei Kalinin, Justin Holl, and one of Bibeau/Sparks.

As much as the team likes Holl, he's ceiling is sub-NHL so you might as well just give him an AHL contract. One of the two goalies has to go as neither is much of an option to make room for Kaskisuo.

Of the UFAs to re-up: Andrew Campbell, but preferably on an AHL contract, a la Clune; and since Babcock needs his security blanket, Brian Boyle to 2ishM for 1 or 2 years (please no more than that, ugh $5M+ 4th line).
 
So, last season, Kadri was tops on the team with 45 points. Tonight, Bozak became the 6th Leaf forward to hit that mark.
 
bustaheims said:
So, last season, Kadri was tops on the team with 45 points. Tonight, Bozak became the 6th Leaf forward to hit that mark.

The Fun Quotient is about 6x higher too.
 
This is far better than the Carlisle/Horechuck season when there seemed to be no hope.  Phaneuf and Clarksons contracts like anchor weights on the Titanic. Thank god for Shanahan, Babcock, Hunter,  Lou and Dubas. What a turn around!
 
bustaheims said:
So, last season, Kadri was tops on the team with 45 points. Tonight, Bozak became the 6th Leaf forward to hit that mark.

This game is fun!  Last year PA Parenteau was the only player to score 20+ goals (well, he was bang on 20).  We already have three 20+ goal scorers (Matthews - 31, Kadri - 28, JVR - 20)
 
Kind of an interesting point from Vice's Biscuits podcast from Sean McIndoe re: the apparently aborted larger trade between Tampa and Toronto that would have seen Filppula be part of the Boyle deal as a salary dump on Tampa's part.

Basically the idea put forth is that the reason Filppula wasn't willing to waive his NTC to Toronto is because of the Leafs reputation/willingness to bury salary dump guys like Michalek/Fehr/Laich in the minors and Filppula, who's not ancient and has been reasonably productive this year, I guess thought he had a more likely chance of being given a fair shot at ice time with the Flyers.

Anyways, on the heels of Michalek saying he regretted waiving his NTC to come here I think it's fair to say that the whole Lamoriello Island stuff is maybe spreading throughout the league and it is going to limit the Leafs ability to get really creative in terms of adding assets by taking on salary. Now, as pointed out on the podcast, overpaid guys with NTC's not wanting to come here isn't a terrible loss but it is something to consider going forward.
 
Coco-puffs said:
I'm pretty sure Filpulla has a no Movement clause.  Ie he wouldn't have had to worry about getting buried by the Leafs.
I heard he has a passion for Phili Cheese Steaks hot off the grill.
 
Coco-puffs said:
I'm pretty sure Filpulla has a no Movement clause.  Ie he wouldn't have had to worry about getting buried by the Leafs.

Isn't the deal with those things that once you're traded the conditions of the deal become null/void? Or is that just NTCs?
 
Highlander said:
This is far better than the Carlisle/Horechuck season when there seemed to be no hope.  Phaneuf and Clarksons contracts like anchor weights on the Titanic. Thank god for Shanahan, Babcock, Hunter,  Lou and Dubas. What a turn around!

I know! Much better than Carlysle fricking toastergate. It was only a few years a go Burkie was scraping together a first line center from a Massachuttes college, a goalie from a Swedish elite-league and flipping two first-rounder for Phil. There was simply nothing after years of JFJ desolation and Mats retired. And the peak of it was a first-round exit in a shortened 2013 season and a few years of being in the mushy middle.

To be fair neither GMs really had the mandate/vision to do what Brendan Shanahan did: 'Ok, that's it. This is a league where only elite players come through the draft. We're taking it to the bone and doing what Chicago did. Y'all stick around for a bit and Toronto will once again be in their rightful place in the league. And here's Babcock and Lou to see I'm serious.' Frankly neither of those guys would even be here unless they believed Shanny, both have said it publicly.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Coco-puffs said:
I'm pretty sure Filpulla has a no Movement clause.  Ie he wouldn't have had to worry about getting buried by the Leafs.

Isn't the deal with those things that once you're traded the conditions of the deal become null/void? Or is that just NTCs?

https://www.capfriendly.com/faq#nmc

Only becomes voided if traded before your UFA years or you actually waive your clause. I believe He didn't waive to go to Philly- they were just on his list.  In the case of the Leafs, they could have refused to sign the addendum. If he was worried about it he could have said I'll only consent if you promise the addendum.
 
Coco-puffs said:
In the case of the Leafs, they could have refused to sign the addendum. If he was worried about it he could have said I'll only consent if you promise the addendum.

Which I suppose is possible that he did and his refusal to waive was based on the Leafs refusal to sign the addendum.

But even still, I think it misses the point. The Leafs could, if they chose, keep Filppula up and simply never play him. Or we could spend all of next year hearing about Filppula's mysterious injury keeping him out of play.

I think the point still is that once you gain a reputation for maybe being willing to take vets and treat them in a way they think is fair then a reputation can spread and some players in similar situations will be wary about joining your team.

Like I said, it's not a huge loss or anything but it's worth noting.
 
Nik the Trik said:
Coco-puffs said:
In the case of the Leafs, they could have refused to sign the addendum. If he was worried about it he could have said I'll only consent if you promise the addendum.

Which I suppose is possible that he did and his refusal to waive was based on the Leafs refusal to sign the addendum.

But even still, I think it misses the point. The Leafs could, if they chose, keep Filppula up and simply never play him. Or we could spend all of next year hearing about Filppula's mysterious injury keeping him out of play.

I think the point still is that once you gain a reputation for maybe being willing to take vets and treat them in a way they think is fair then a reputation can spread and some players in similar situations will be wary about joining your team.

Like I said, it's not a huge loss or anything but it's worth noting.

Agreed. The problem with being sly in repeated encounters is that people learn.

I specifically think that they have fudged the facts around Lupul's injury, and that other veterans don't like it. Between i) Kadri's assertion that Lupul looked good to go at the beginning of the year and ii) the almost complete silence from a normally gregarious and marketable Lupul, something is up.
 

About Us

This website is NOT associated with the Toronto Maple Leafs or the NHL.


It is operated by Rick Couchman and Jeff Lewis.
Back
Top