Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CarltonTheBear said:Wouldn't be stunned if this turned out to be a Vlasic-type deal where he's certainly worth it for a little while because of how good he is defensively but if his defensive play even dips a little bit that combined with a non-existent offensive game could make the back half of the deal a little rough.
CarltonTheBear said:Wouldn't be stunned if this turned out to be a Vlasic-type deal where he's certainly worth it for a little while because of how good he is defensively but if his defensive play even dips a little bit that combined with a non-existent offensive game could make the back half of the deal a little rough.
herman said:Is this not the Minnesota Wild Way?
Their capsheet is so weird. Definitely going 8-1 for the expansion draft? Or trading away something useful for Seattle soft-protect their youngest top-4 defenseman?
Frank E said:Capfriendly has it at $6m.
bustaheims said:That being said, they don't have a ton they really need to protect upfront, so, going 8-1 is probably the more likely option.
CarltonTheBear said:Even if you expect them to sign a top-6 forward like say Hoffman this offseason, they could still probably go the 8-1 protection route and the best forward exposed would be like... Luke Kunin? Maybe Jordan Greenway? I don't think they're really sweating that one. Still think Dumba gets traded by then though.
bustaheims said:Yeah. They don't have a clear 4th forward to protect. They really only have one forward that they'd need to protect from a talent and age POV. Parise and Zuccarello are useful forwards, but with their age and cap hits, if they didn't have NMCs, I'd consider exposing them just to be rid of their contracts.
herman said:https://twitter.com/PierreVLeBrun/status/1305943947169148929
Projecting fans back in the stands in 3 years, eh?
herman said:https://twitter.com/habslinks/status/1305972472244768769
Praise be
Frank E said:I still remember how crazy some here thought they were for trading Subban.
I'm betting the haven't aged well That Weber contract was horrible. Might still be for Nashville if Weber retires lol. I didn't see PK's game falling off the cliff like it has.Frycer14 said:Frank E said:I still remember how crazy some here thought they were for trading Subban.
Heh, this is true. I wonder how some of the comments on that trade have aged.
Guilt Trip said:I'm betting the haven't aged well That Weber contract was horrible. Might still be for Nashville if Weber retires lol. I didn't see PK's game falling off the cliff like it has.
You mean testing players pre combine? Sorry, but Chayka in retrospect looks like a bit of an idiot. I think Dubas will course correct.Frank E said:herman said:https://twitter.com/habslinks/status/1305972472244768769
Praise be
Eh, I'm starting to think that Dubas might end up with the same legacy as Chayka...so I'm not going to be too critical of the habs until it doesn't work. I still remember how crazy some here thought they were for trading Subban.
Just because the outcome was unfavorable doesn't mean the evaluation process was flawed necessarily. Nobody expected Subban to fall off a cliff and clearly Weber is defying the normal aging curve.Frycer14 said:Frank E said:I still remember how crazy some here thought they were for trading Subban.
Heh, this is true. I wonder how some of the comments on that trade have aged.
Bender said:You mean testing players pre combine? Sorry, but Chayka in retrospect looks like a bit of an idiot. I think Dubas will course correct.Frank E said:herman said:https://twitter.com/habslinks/status/1305972472244768769
Praise be
Eh, I'm starting to think that Dubas might end up with the same legacy as Chayka...so I'm not going to be too critical of the habs until it doesn't work. I still remember how crazy some here thought they were for trading Subban.