Rebel_1812
New member
hockeyfan1 said:Highlander said:I guess the thing we need to discuss is whether the players of today, that have guaranteed luxury retirement happen with their first contracts, can be motivated by a coach in todays market, where mid level free agents demand multi year multi million dollar deals. What is the motivation in a 30 team league crying out for a higher level of talent.
I hate to say but with the Original 6, the players had to take summer jobs to make ends meet and because there where only 6 teams if you didnt bring your A game every day, then there where 5 guys ready to do so. We cannot sit the Kessels, Phanuefs and Clarksons, they will just laugh at you and say "I'm Untouchable, I am Rich and that is beyond your control".
So how much do coaches really need to be blamed (and you know how I feel about Randy).
We need someone to whom these guys can relate, we need a motivator more than a coach
Exactly. A motivator, one who knows how to relate to today's hockey-playing athlete. A Mike Babcock type comes to mind.
A coach AND a GM with a good hockey mind, hockey know-how, smart, sharp, with good hockey knowledge, would be a boon to this franchise once again.
I remember ex-Leaf Rick Vaive who once said, "If you make $100,000 and can't get motivated, something's wrong."
In those days, $100.000 was still considered a sizeable sum. That was then, this is now. Different eras, different thinking. How do you 'motivate' someone making ten times the above-mentioned salary in these times, particularly one who plays for the Toronto Maple Leafs?
Its funny you should mention Babcock. He couldn't get the Ducks to win; Caryle came in and did a better job. This guy is not a bad coach, he did win a Stanley cup after all. Moreover, he is the only coach that has got the leafs to the post season since the lockout of 2003. I don't think he will be back next year, but don't act like just a coaching change will turn things around. If that was the case firing Wilson would have improved the make up of the team and it didn't.